The State Water Resources Control Board convened on April 2, 2025, to address various issues concerning public participation in policy-making, particularly in light of recent challenges faced during virtual hearings. The meeting highlighted significant concerns raised by citizens, especially seniors, regarding the accessibility and clarity of the board's processes.
The session began with a public comment from a concerned citizen who expressed frustration over the difficulties faced by seniors in participating in policy statements. The individual noted that many seniors did not receive confirmation emails for participation and struggled with confusing instructions. Additionally, the transition to a fully virtual hearing, which was initially expected to be hybrid, left some participants unable to voice their concerns due to technical issues, including a Zoom bombing incident that disrupted the March 24 hearing.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The speaker emphasized that the board's communication practices were inconsistent, leading to confusion among potential participants. They urged the board to ensure that public engagement opportunities are equitable and accessible, similar to those afforded to government officials and water contractors.
Following this, Ashley Castaneda, Communications Coordinator for Restore the Delta, addressed the board, underscoring the importance of education and community engagement in the restoration of Delta waterways. Castaneda criticized the board's handling of the Zoom bombing incident, stating that the public was left uninformed for two hours while her team managed to provide timely updates through social media. She called for the board to take responsibility for ensuring safe public engagement and to document incidents like the Zoom bombing, outlining steps for improvement.
The meeting underscored the board's responsibility to facilitate transparent and accessible public participation in its proceedings. The discussions highlighted the need for improved communication and support for citizens, particularly vulnerable populations, to ensure their voices are heard in critical water resource management decisions. The board's next steps will likely involve addressing these concerns to enhance public trust and engagement in future meetings.