Minnesota lawmakers are taking a bold step toward reshaping campaign finance laws with the introduction of Senate Bill 3254, a joint resolution calling for a constitutional convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. This groundbreaking move aims to address the pressing need for campaign finance reform, a topic that has sparked intense debate across the nation.

The bill, introduced on April 3, 2025, by Senators Bahr and Port, seeks to unite states in a bipartisan effort to propose amendments that could significantly alter the landscape of political funding. By invoking Article V, Minnesota's legislature is not only asserting its authority but also encouraging a collective dialogue among states about how to tackle the influence of money in politics.

Key provisions of the bill emphasize that while Minnesota is advocating for a convention, it does not commit the state to endorse any specific proposals that may emerge. This cautious approach aims to foster a collaborative environment where various reform ideas can be explored without pre-judging their viability.

The resolution comes amid growing public concern over the role of money in elections, particularly following landmark Supreme Court decisions that have expanded the influence of corporate and dark money in political campaigns. Advocates for reform argue that without significant changes, the democratic process risks being undermined by wealthy interests.

Opposition to the bill has surfaced, with critics warning that a constitutional convention could lead to unintended consequences, potentially opening the door to radical changes beyond campaign finance reform. This concern echoes historical apprehensions about the risks associated with amending the Constitution.

As the bill moves forward, its implications could resonate far beyond Minnesota. If successful, it could pave the way for a national conversation on campaign finance, potentially leading to reforms that enhance transparency and accountability in political funding. The outcome of this legislative effort will be closely watched, as it could set a precedent for how states engage with federal constitutional processes in the future.