A pivotal discussion on enhancing mental health services in North Dakota schools took center stage during the House Industry, Business and Labor meeting on April 2, 2025. Lawmakers debated a proposed compact aimed at increasing the availability of licensed school psychologists, particularly in smaller districts that struggle to afford full-time staff.

Representative Warri highlighted the pressing need for more accessible psychological services, noting that many smaller schools rely on contracted professionals who often provide telehealth services. "If we can increase the number of licensed professionals through the compact, we could significantly boost the availability of these essential services," he stated.

The compact would allow psychologists licensed in other states to practice in North Dakota, provided they meet specific qualifications. This move is seen as a way to address the shortage of school psychologists, with only about 80 currently serving a much larger number of schools across the state. The discussion also touched on the qualifications of contracted versus full-time psychologists, with concerns raised about the differences in training and oversight.

However, the proposal faced skepticism from some committee members. Representative Brown expressed concerns about parental oversight, questioning whether the compact could potentially allow psychologists to counsel students without notifying their parents. "That's where my concern lies with this bill," he remarked, emphasizing the importance of parental involvement in mental health matters.

Despite the apprehensions, supporters of the compact argued that it would not change existing laws regarding parental notification and would instead streamline the licensing process for out-of-state professionals. "We need to be proactive in shaping the rules that will govern this compact," said Vice Chair Osterly, advocating for North Dakota's involvement in the compact to ensure influence over future regulations.

As the committee deliberated, opinions remained divided. While some members saw the compact as a necessary step toward improving mental health resources in schools, others questioned its timing and necessity, citing a lack of complaints regarding current licensing processes. The meeting concluded with a call for further consideration, leaving the future of the compact uncertain as lawmakers weigh the benefits against potential risks.