The Finance, Ways, and Means Committee of the Tennessee State Legislature convened on April 1, 2025, to discuss House Bill 968, which aims to regulate vape products in the state. The bill proposes a product registry for legal vape products, requiring manufacturers to prove their products are either FDA-approved or in the approval process. This initiative is part of a broader effort to curb youth vaping and address the influx of illegal vape products, particularly those imported from China.
Chairman Hawke emphasized the need for the bill, stating that it aligns with federal law, which prohibits the sale of unapproved vape products. He noted that the legislation includes a universal carding provision, similar to alcohol laws, to ensure that retailers check the age of customers purchasing vape products. Additionally, a user fee on vape products will be implemented to fund enforcement of the new regulations.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free During the meeting, several stakeholders voiced their concerns about the bill. Representatives from the vaping industry argued that the legislation could harm small businesses by unfairly targeting open system vaping products, which they claim are not the source of youth vaping issues. They highlighted that disposables, often sold illegally, are the primary concern and urged lawmakers to exempt open systems from the registry.
Testimonies from industry representatives revealed a divide in opinions. Some argued that the bill would effectively eliminate legal businesses while failing to address the root causes of youth vaping. Others supported the bill, asserting that strong regulations are necessary to create a level playing field and protect public health.
The committee members engaged in discussions about the implications of the bill, with some expressing a willingness to consider amendments to protect open system products. Chairman Hawke indicated openness to further discussions, suggesting that additional time might be needed to refine the legislation.
As the committee concluded, the future of House Bill 968 remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about balancing public health concerns with the interests of small businesses in the vaping industry. The next steps will involve further deliberations and potential amendments to address the concerns raised during the meeting.