The Senate Judiciary Committee convened on March 31, 2025, to discuss a proposed study committee aimed at evaluating the feasibility of a "distance to drive" program. This initiative seeks to facilitate the reinstatement of suspended and revoked driver licenses for individuals with criminal offenses, contingent upon meeting court objectives and fulfilling requirements set by the Department of Safety.
The proposal includes the formation of a study committee comprising various stakeholders: a member of the House of Representatives appointed by the Speaker, a Senate appointee, a General Sessions judge, a law enforcement officer, and a public member with expertise in criminal justice appointed by the governor. The intent behind this initiative is to alleviate the burden on jails by providing individuals with a pathway to regain their driving privileges, thereby enabling them to secure employment.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Senator Rose moved to amend the bill, which was seconded by Senator White. Following a brief discussion, the committee voted in favor of the amendment, which was confirmed to enhance the original bill.
The committee then heard from Stephen Crump, the executive director of the Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference, and Mike Donovan, the deputy executive director. They expressed cautious support for the initiative, emphasizing the importance of studying the circumstances under which licenses are suspended or revoked. They highlighted the potential impact on employment opportunities for individuals affected by these suspensions, particularly in cases where transportation is a barrier to maintaining jobs.
Crump noted that while the proposal could serve as a valuable tool for keeping individuals employed, the effectiveness of the program would depend on the outcomes of the study. Donovan echoed this sentiment, stressing the need to ensure that the program does not interfere with mandatory license revocations for serious offenses such as DUI or vehicular homicide.
The discussion underscored the committee's commitment to exploring avenues that support rehabilitation and employment for individuals with criminal backgrounds, while also considering the implications for victims and the justice system. The meeting concluded with a consensus on the importance of further study to inform future legislative actions.