The Montana Legislature has introduced Senate Bill 35, aimed at revising the calculation of Average Number Belonging (ANB) for public school funding. The bill, presented on March 29, 2025, seeks to address issues related to student enrollment counts and funding allocations for schools across the state.

One of the key provisions of SB 35 is the adjustment of ANB calculations for students who demonstrate proficiency in specific content areas. Under the proposed legislation, school boards will have the authority to convert a pupil's ANB to an hourly equivalent based on the hours of instruction typically provided for the content in which the student has shown proficiency. This change is intended to better reflect the actual instructional time and resources utilized for each student.

Additionally, the bill stipulates that students concurrently enrolled in multiple public schools or districts will only be counted as one full-time pupil for ANB purposes, with specific provisions for those participating in jumpstart programs. This aims to streamline funding and ensure that resources are allocated efficiently.

The bill also addresses the enrollment of kindergarten students transitioning from half-time to full-time programs, allowing districts to count previous year enrollments as full-time for funding calculations. Furthermore, it establishes guidelines for counting students who have been absent for extended periods and clarifies the inclusion criteria for preschool and special education students.

Debate surrounding SB 35 has focused on its potential impact on school funding and resource distribution. Proponents argue that the bill will create a more equitable funding model that reflects student needs and performance. However, some critics express concerns that the changes could lead to funding disparities among districts, particularly those with higher rates of absenteeism or varying enrollment practices.

The implications of SB 35 extend beyond funding; they may also influence educational outcomes and resource allocation in Montana's public schools. As the bill progresses through the legislative process, stakeholders are closely monitoring its potential effects on the state's education system.

In conclusion, Senate Bill 35 represents a significant shift in how Montana calculates school funding based on student enrollment. As discussions continue, the bill's outcomes could reshape the landscape of public education funding in the state, making it a critical topic for educators, policymakers, and communities alike.