Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Montana Legislature passes HB 926 to transfer funds for coal severance tax

March 29, 2025 | Introduced House Bills, 2025 House and Senate Bills, Montana Legislation Bills, Montana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Montana Legislature passes HB 926 to transfer funds for coal severance tax
Under the bright lights of the Montana State Capitol, lawmakers gathered on March 29, 2025, to discuss House Bill 926, a legislative proposal that aims to streamline the state’s financial resources. Introduced by Representative J. Schillinger, the bill seeks to transfer funds from the Debt and Liability Free Account to bolster the Coal Severance Tax Permanent Fund, a move that could have significant implications for the state’s fiscal landscape.

At its core, House Bill 926 proposes the transfer of all unobligated and unexpended funds from the Debt and Liability Free Account into the Coal Severance Tax Permanent Fund. This fund, established under the Montana Constitution, is designed to support long-term financial stability for the state, particularly in relation to coal severance taxes. The bill also includes a modest appropriation of $100 from the general fund to the Department of Revenue to facilitate the implementation of this transfer.

The bill's supporters argue that this transfer is a prudent use of existing funds, allowing for a more effective allocation of resources that can ultimately benefit Montana’s economy. By enhancing the Coal Severance Tax Permanent Fund, proponents believe the state can better prepare for future financial challenges and ensure that revenues from coal extraction are preserved for future generations.

However, the bill has not been without its critics. Some lawmakers have raised concerns about the potential impact on other funding priorities, particularly in education and infrastructure. An amendment included in the bill stipulates that if Senate Bill No. 90 does not pass, the funds would instead be redirected to the Montana School Facilities Fund, highlighting the ongoing debate over how best to allocate state resources.

The discussions surrounding House Bill 926 reflect broader economic and political themes in Montana, where resource management and fiscal responsibility are often at the forefront of legislative priorities. As the bill moves through the legislative process, its fate could signal a shift in how the state approaches its financial planning and resource allocation.

With an immediate effective date upon passage, the urgency surrounding House Bill 926 underscores the importance of timely decision-making in state governance. As lawmakers weigh the potential benefits against the concerns raised, the outcome of this bill could have lasting implications for Montana’s financial future and its commitment to sustainable resource management.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Montana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI