Become a Founder Member Now!

Representative Fitzpatrick advocates changes to Montana's historic preservation funding criteria

March 28, 2025 | 2025 Legislature MT, Montana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Representative Fitzpatrick advocates changes to Montana's historic preservation funding criteria
The Senate Finance and Claims meeting on March 28, 2025, focused on key legislative proposals aimed at improving economic development and historic preservation in Montana. The discussions highlighted House Bill 12 and House Bill 756, both of which seek to refine criteria for project evaluations and funding allocations.

House Bill 12, presented by Representative Fitzpatrick, addressed concerns regarding the current economic development criteria, which were described as overly generic and unworkable. Fitzpatrick emphasized the need for more precise guidelines, particularly for housing projects and private sector businesses. He noted that the legislature holds the authority to amend these criteria without being bound by state agency recommendations, urging committee members to consider necessary changes.

House Bill 756, also introduced by Fitzpatrick, aims to enhance the evaluation process for historic preservation projects. The bill proposes several amendments, including the exclusion of projects with limited public benefit from eligibility and the requirement for for-profit entities to match grant funding dollar-for-dollar. Fitzpatrick explained that these changes would ensure that funding is directed towards projects that genuinely benefit the community and preserve Montana's historical sites.

Support for House Bill 756 was voiced by Mandy Rambo, acting director of the Montana Department of Commerce, who expressed appreciation for the bill's clarifications. However, Jenny Budenborg, executive director of Preserve Montana, offered a cautious opposition, acknowledging the bill's intent while advocating for the original goals of the historic preservation program.

The meeting concluded with a call for further discussion on these bills, emphasizing the importance of refining legislative criteria to better serve Montana's economic and cultural interests. The outcomes of these discussions could significantly impact future funding and project approvals in the state.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Montana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI