Become a Founder Member Now!

Senateville fire officials oppose House Bill 547 citing risks to rural fire services

March 28, 2025 | 2025 Legislature MT, Montana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senateville fire officials oppose House Bill 547 citing risks to rural fire services
The Senate Local Government meeting held on March 28, 2025, focused on significant concerns regarding House Bill 547, which aims to consolidate authority over rural fire districts in Montana. Several speakers, including fire district officials and county commissioners, voiced strong opposition to the bill, citing potential negative impacts on rural fire services and community safety.

Chairman of the Senateville Rural Fire District raised alarms about the centralization of authority, stating that recent changes have led to inadequate resources and a lack of consultation with rural departments. He highlighted that equipment previously owned by rural districts was transferred to the county, resulting in outdated resources being allocated to them. This shift has restricted their operational capabilities and communication with dispatch services, raising concerns about response times in emergencies.

Karen Sargent, a seasoned firefighter with 27 years of experience, echoed these sentiments, arguing that the bill misrepresents the training and safety standards upheld by volunteer fire departments. She emphasized that the relationship between volunteer districts and the Butte Silver Bow Career Fire Department has deteriorated, and passing the bill would not resolve these issues.

Dan Callahan, a county commissioner, warned that the bill could lead to the closure of volunteer fire departments, jeopardizing homeowners' insurance and overall community safety amid increasing fire threats. He urged committee members to consider the implications for rural residents and vote against the bill.

Ed Fisher, a long-serving chief of the Boulevard Rural Fire District, also expressed his concerns, recalling the historical context of laws designed to protect rural fire services. He underscored the importance of maintaining local control and resources for effective emergency response.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between rural fire districts and centralized governance, with multiple stakeholders advocating for the preservation of local fire services to ensure community safety. The committee's decision on House Bill 547 will be pivotal in shaping the future of fire protection in Montana's rural areas.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Montana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI