A heated discussion on House Bill 201 unfolded during the Montana Legislature's Free Conference Committee meeting, focusing on transparency and accountability in the petition signature gathering process. Proponents, including Amelia Gilsdorf from FGA Action, emphasized the bill's nonpartisan nature and its aim to enhance voter transparency. Gilsdorf praised the proposed amendments, highlighting their importance in ensuring voters are well-informed.

However, the bill faced significant opposition from the ACLU of Montana, represented by SK Rossi. Rossi raised concerns about the practicality and safety of requiring signature gatherers to announce their identities repeatedly in public spaces. He warned that such measures could lead to harassment and hostility, particularly in contentious ballot initiatives, citing previous incidents where law enforcement had to intervene due to aggressive opposition tactics.

The committee also heard from Representative Mitchell, who echoed concerns about aggressive signature gathering practices, noting that law enforcement had been involved in past incidents. The discussions underscored the delicate balance between ensuring transparency for voters and protecting the rights and safety of those involved in the petition process.

As the committee moves forward, the implications of this bill could significantly impact how signature gathering is conducted in Montana, with potential changes to the legal landscape surrounding public accountability and voter engagement.