Montana preservation advocates oppose SB 214 limiting historic boards' authority

During a recent meeting of the Montana Legislature's House Local Government Committee, significant concerns were raised regarding Senate Bill 214, which proposes to remove the authority of historic preservation boards to review zoning permit or variance applications that affect historic properties. This change, highlighted in Section 5 of the bill, has sparked debate among lawmakers and preservation advocates, as it could undermine the role these boards play in safeguarding Montana's historic buildings and neighborhoods.

Historic preservation boards are established by local elected officials to address community needs and are composed of citizen volunteers with expertise in preservation. They are crucial in ensuring that development proposals respect the historical significance of properties, which can enhance community vibrancy and maintain eligibility for funding assistance, such as historic tax credits and grants. The proposed bill's removal of their review authority raises questions about the future of these resources, especially as Montana experiences rapid growth and development.

The implications of SB 214 extend beyond local governance. The bill could disrupt the established preservation network linked to the federal National Historic Preservation Act, which includes approximately 1,100 properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places across Montana. These properties require owner consent for designation and are vital to the state's cultural heritage. The act also supports a program for certified local governments (CLGs), which provides technical and financial assistance for preservation efforts. To maintain CLG status, communities must have a historic preservation board or commission.

Opponents of SB 214, including representatives from Preserve Montana, argue that the bill could weaken preservation efforts and diminish the economic and community benefits that historic preservation brings. They warn that the legislation may lead to unintended consequences, potentially triggering a reevaluation of local codes and processes tied to design and demolition reviews.

As the committee continues to deliberate on the bill, the future of Montana's historic preservation efforts hangs in the balance. Stakeholders are urging lawmakers to reconsider the proposed changes or seek amendments that would protect the integrity of historic properties and the communities they serve. The outcome of this discussion will likely have lasting effects on the preservation landscape in Montana.