Testimony challenges Rocky Mountain Power's handling of wildfire mitigation cost analysis

In a recent government meeting held on March 26, 2025, discussions surrounding Rocky Mountain Power's (RMP) wildfire mitigation plan took center stage, highlighting significant concerns about the company's approach to balancing costs and risks. The meeting, part of the Phase III Hearing on Fire Plan Docket Issues, revealed critical insights into the ongoing debate over RMP's compliance with legislative requirements.

One of the key points raised during the meeting was the assertion that RMP has not adequately provided the necessary cost versus risk information in its wildfire mitigation strategies. Testimony from various parties, including expert witness Mr. Alvarez, emphasized that RMP's claims of having a robust mitigation selection process were unfounded. Alvarez pointed out that the company's documentation lacked sufficient detail on how it incorporates cost versus risk analysis into its decision-making. He noted that the relevant sections of RMP's plan were minimal, consisting of only a few sentences, and did not meet the expectations set forth by the legislature in the Wildfire Act.

Alvarez also addressed rebuttals from RMP representatives, specifically targeting claims made by Ms. Stewart and Mr. Jones. He argued that their assertions about the adequacy of RMP's information were misleading, as the company had failed to provide the necessary analyses to support their claims. This lack of transparency raises concerns about the effectiveness of RMP's wildfire mitigation efforts and its ability to protect the community from fire risks.

The implications of these discussions are significant for Utah residents, as the effectiveness of RMP's wildfire protection plan directly impacts public safety and financial accountability. Alvarez's recommendations to the commission included rejecting RMP's current plan until it can demonstrate a proper balance of identified fire risks and mitigation costs. He also urged the commission to require a risk-informed benefit-cost analysis for future wildfire protection plans, emphasizing the need for thorough evaluation and transparency.

As the hearing continues, the outcomes will play a crucial role in shaping the future of wildfire management in Utah, ensuring that the community's safety is prioritized and that utility companies are held accountable for their plans and actions. The commission's decisions will not only affect RMP's operations but also the broader goal of enhancing fire safety measures across the state.