Schools mandated to train staff on CPR and AED use under new education guidelines

On March 24, 2025, Massachusetts lawmakers introduced House Bill 2556, a significant piece of legislation aimed at enhancing the safety of students in schools through the mandatory provision of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) and training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This bill responds to growing concerns about the health risks faced by students, particularly during physical activities, and seeks to ensure that schools are equipped to handle cardiac emergencies effectively.

The bill mandates that all public and private schools, including charter schools, must provide and maintain AEDs on their premises. In addition to the installation of these life-saving devices, the legislation requires that all school staff, including sports coaches, receive comprehensive training in CPR and the use of AEDs. This training is crucial, as it empowers staff to act swiftly and effectively in emergency situations, potentially saving lives.

One of the notable provisions of House Bill 2556 is the allowance for schools that face financial constraints to apply for a hardship waiver. This waiver would enable them to seek assistance from the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, which will provide a list of grants and funding sources to help schools acquire AEDs. This aspect of the bill highlights the lawmakers' recognition of the financial challenges many schools face while still prioritizing student safety.

The bill also includes a liability protection clause for school staff who provide emergency care in good faith. This provision aims to encourage staff to act in emergencies without fear of legal repercussions, except in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct. This legal safeguard is expected to foster a culture of responsiveness and preparedness within schools.

While the bill has garnered support from various health and education advocates, it has also sparked debates regarding the financial implications for schools and the feasibility of implementing such training programs. Critics have raised concerns about the potential burden on school budgets, especially in districts already facing funding challenges. However, proponents argue that the long-term benefits of having trained staff and accessible AEDs far outweigh the initial costs, emphasizing the importance of student safety.

The implications of House Bill 2556 extend beyond immediate health concerns; they reflect a broader commitment to student welfare and emergency preparedness in Massachusetts schools. As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its potential to reshape school safety protocols and enhance the readiness of staff to respond to medical emergencies will be closely monitored. If passed, this legislation could serve as a model for other states looking to improve safety measures in educational environments.