[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6109097,"mediaKeyId","2764595-5c12c53175427fb0d6ae1eddf0bd04d8","parentId",2764595,"title","Votes at a glance: House advances a package of revenue, banking, licensing and education bills","audioSeconds",5297,"startMs",718000,"endMs",6015000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2764595-5c12c53175427fb0d6ae1eddf0bd04d8&start=718&end=6015","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2764595-5c12c53175427fb0d6ae1eddf0bd04d8/thumbnail_718000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6109097/Oklahoma/Votes-at-a-glance-House-advances-a-package-of-revenue-banking-licensing-and-education-bills","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6109097-e55e2b9504ed018c7d32dcbb3d091a3b/orig.mp4?Expires=1771083166&Signature=HBIaO-n9nrIElpvy1AZcoGunv~O681zZ-YKE3zfJqa0elG0Oz4UyZbvTv5ja1AYuyN8ZBFCYSydbV6nM4rGjwPVegsIvmv-TgVS4sG~P7e~9wWVTnYv8sBDGWa8YLVmCuov1Jed~qk8mQFkWLKOEVIJHGVK2FIfmUne2Z2D1joXxcQEk2pVvRorlU~NMUhI~tBRnrVYmtWrdNLuilP2ygeO4eWYxq15qk5B5ZH9GR4uD3sMlhhr7G40rA4weMBKKp7tAHlBlF4WnNRinwPrEnTjbdRZfbhupGRwfSNKUT3vCPhL6RLN34AMGNI2243D557uDegO-DqnzpsXJ02j85w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Oklahoma Legislature","date","2025-03-25T00:00:00Z","article","The Oklahoma House advanced and passed multiple measures on final passage during this floor session. The following summary lists the bills that received final passage with the recorded roll-call tallies as shown on the House floor.

Key actions and vote tallies

- House Bill 23-76 (criminal procedure; District Attorneys Council reporting): passed, recorded vote 74 ayes, 0 nays. Representative Hill said the change moves an existing DAC report from an on‑request basis to an every‑other‑year automatic filing to ensure oversight.

- House Bill 20-80 (banks and trust companies; payable-on-death account language): passed, recorded vote 87 ayes, 0 nays. Representative Blair said the bill addresses a discrepancy between bank and credit union statutes.

- House Bill 20-84 (professions and occupations; construction industry cleanup): passed, recorded vote 86 ayes, 5 nays. Representative Blair described the bill as cleanup language requested by the Construction Industries Board.

- House Bill 20-85 (Oklahoma Uniform Building Code Commission training): passed, recorded vote 81 ayes, 9 nays. The bill authorizes training for those affected by adopted building codes.

- House Bill 26-46 (gambling-loss deduction changes): passed, recorded vote 68 ayes, 25 nays. Representative Becketterer described the measure as altering tax treatment of gambling losses.

- House Bill 27-46 (Oklahoma Remote Quality Jobs Incentive Act amendment): passed, recorded vote 72 ayes, 11 nays. Representative Lawson said the bill adjusts employee premium-share language for benefit plans.

- House Bill 22-47 (special education; parental-rights posting to OSDE website): passed, recorded vote 75 ayes, 16 nays. Representative Waldron said the bill places federal least‑restrictive-environment guidance on the OSDE website.

- House Bill 28-36 (veterans assistance; fee compliance amendment adopted): passed, recorded vote 94 ayes, 0 nays. A floor amendment clarified any fee charged to veterans must comply with federal law.

- House Bill 17-51 (motor vehicles; Service Oklahoma cleanup): passed, recorded vote 85 ayes, 8 nays. Representative Curbs characterized the measure as a Service Oklahoma cleanup (credentialing and records alignment).

- House Bill 1,600 (health-care parental-consent language; “Lori Brand” bill reference): passed, recorded vote 84 ayes, 10 nays. Representative Geiss adopted an amendment referencing Title 25 (parental bill of rights) to tighten minor‑care language.

Brief context: most of these measures passed with little on-floor debate beyond clarifying questions and a small number of members seeking details, such as how amendments would operate or whether statutory cross-references exist. Where amendments were adopted on the floor, the House took unanimous‑consent steps to incorporate them before final passage.

What the transcript does not specify: the House proceedings recorded votes and passages; the transcript does not include full bill texts or the exact implementation timelines for each bill. Any fiscal or rulemaking details would be found in the enacted text and accompanying fiscal notes or agency implementation instructions.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","House of Representatives First Regular Session of the 60th Legislature Day 28 Morning Session Mar 25, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Oklahoma House cleared a large set of mostly noncontroversial bills on the floor, including changes to criminal procedure reporting, film incentives, banking and occupational rules, with recorded roll-call votes on each measure.","taxTitle","2025 Legislature OK, Oklahoma","taxId",78380,"location","Oklahoma","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6109100,"House advances ODOT land-return bill after lawmakers question look-back language",511,5005000,5516000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2764595-5c12c53175427fb0d6ae1eddf0bd04d8&start=5005&end=5516","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2764595-5c12c53175427fb0d6ae1eddf0bd04d8/thumbnail_5005000.jpg","/articles/6109100/Oklahoma/House-advances-ODOT-land-return-bill-after-lawmakers-question-look-back-language","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6109100-88e0e78ab172a4e8280c81157e4b870e/orig.mp4?Expires=1771083166&Signature=G~i4k8rSUU0eep7xaHnHI3hoagOvJsHo8QBke3akFrI9JJ-uKzsIN-g3FVepBvkDL2vr2AnnFDcWAqNZqu9Rx1-hRaOCU9VBMoKJD34OJFz5D6XFB~Q1qkloHFB07ItJCsY1wzmOmYySeVqaovCVD8isl7ZQ3v06CTjtWyQ0PClQuH-7LR8OtEK1wR-TSllRQKk2dN8fW1lZo84iKO4c2dnCX06sKcHXGV9qub09zl-vTKDn2Zzc7CMH2G-~SljIN2hXMqHWLVAI~AMtP9aG7BpU2Hfn5oVxX-VQDTQzN4A-zeK5VYCi99JNW-LBxbw6x9T0QPGUdCfWDG3bNdJkSQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","House Bill 11-03, a constituent-request bill addressing property taken by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation, advanced on final passage after lawmakers spent floor time clarifying how far back former landowners may claim a right of first refusal when ODOT no longer needs property.

Representative Gann explained the bill as extending notice and transparency around ODOT property disposition: it “extends the window for previous landowners to reclaim the reclaim any land, adds transparency to the process with online publication, and clarifies eligibility, ensures and ensures fair offers.” During questioning, he said the bill lengthens a notice period from 30 days to 90 days.

Why it matters: several members questioned whether the bill removed the existing five-year look-back that had limited how far back a former owner could reclaim property at the price originally paid. Representative Fugate and others pressed the point and were told by the author that language had in fact been stricken, meaning there is no explicit time horizon in the bill text for the look-back.

Representative Fugate asked whether the five-year provision had been removed; Representative Gann confirmed that the lines striking the five‑year language remain in the bill and that, “That that language was stricken.” Representative Fugate later summarized the consequence on the House floor: “theoretically, if say that they could go back 50 years ... whatever the price of the land was 50 years ago is what they would be forced to sell it back to that owner today.” Representative Gann said he recalled the committee discussion and acknowledged the change.

Action and outcome: House Bill 11-03 was advanced from general order and passed final passage on a recorded vote of 84 ayes and 9 nays. The clerk declared the bill passed.

Next steps and implementation notes: the bill requires ODOT to publish disposition information online and to provide longer notice to prior owners. The transcript indicates that the removal of the five-year look-back was intentional and was discussed on the floor; the bill text as described would allow claims based on the original acquisition price without an explicit time limit. The transcript does not record subsequent amendments on the floor to reinstate a fixed horizon.","House Bill 11-03, aimed at extending notice periods and clarifying when former landowners can reclaim property taken for road projects, passed the House after floor questions revealed removal of a five-year look‑back limitation in the bill text.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6109105,"Oklahoma House bans sale of lab-grown meat after heated debate",1527,2987000,4514000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2764595-5c12c53175427fb0d6ae1eddf0bd04d8&start=2987&end=4514","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2764595-5c12c53175427fb0d6ae1eddf0bd04d8/thumbnail_2987000.jpg","/articles/6109105/Oklahoma/Oklahoma-House-bans-sale-of-lab-grown-meat-after-heated-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6109105-e06ea1cb81f0967a5bea2870fe2c6908/orig.mp4?Expires=1771083166&Signature=DIsvHLjV-HcQ0IiLQ5sW2Z6P8ZY4HHcys7SDpJgJugyhI5aHLdDY1~3hus3we3I7Q5Hm5MU05cho4ru-XeZx-bDt~iswu3DC2m0rk5zO8B0L41fD2o6dRXap7qZIAZBt3AqLnFgMvex2qj6qWmYYSG8ab65tRh~YT0MwSn5Qcq~5NRADHzeOi~vc98mDGH3zUAURCLGCHbr7hlcrMOAJ37RLOyrTDg~-ywsU1lWZrlTQKrEt0UyzghoV~VbS1QQOmK4Oul~FRRgM50tFT78g0LFjqi82XXUsIL~nzteda8EHHeEkEAxXOCt1vBe9E~rkfOqWgE6K9agtK4qaOKAtjQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","House Bill 28-29, a measure that would ban cultivated (lab-grown) meat from being sold in Oklahoma, passed the House on final passage after extended debate over health risks, consumer choice and impacts on the state's agricultural industry.

Representative Shane Burns, the bill's author, opened the discussion by describing the bill in simple terms: “House bill 28-29 bans lab grown meat. Move for adoption.” The measure drew multiple rounds of questions and lengthy floor debate from members on both sides.

Why it matters: supporters framed the bill as a precautionary public-health and culture-protection measure and said it would protect Oklahoma ranchers; opponents called it a government pick of winners and losers, argued it restricts consumer choice, and raised concerns about religious-liberty implications and innovation. Several members cited scientific uncertainty and regulatory gaps as reasons for caution.

Supporters pressed health and safety concerns. Representative Gann said the product was unproven and urged caution: “This stuff is not safe... It's cancer like sales and ingesting something like that. No one knows what will take place.” Representative Bennett repeatedly characterized lab-grown cell lines as “immortalized” and warned of unknown long-term effects, invoking statutory definitions of meat when discussing labeling and legal treatment.

Opponents argued the bill restricts markets and personal choice. Representative Deck asked, “What are we so afraid of?” and urged regulators and lawmakers to allow research and competition rather than an outright ban. Representative Bennett and others said the bill was an inappropriate government intrusion on market innovation and consumer freedom.

Regulatory and legal context: during debate Representative Bennett referenced the Federal Meat Inspection Act when questioning whether cultivated cell masses meet statutory definitions of “meat.” Representative Gannon noted that the U.S. Department of Agriculture had authorized some cultivated poultry products elsewhere: “this lab grown meat has been authorized by the USDA for chicken since '23,” a point proponents cited to argue for preemptive state action.

Action and outcome: the House advanced the bill and passed final passage. The clerk recorded the final vote as 72 ayes and 18 nays; the presiding officer declared the bill passed.

Next steps: with passage in the House, HB 28-29 will move to the Oklahoma Senate for consideration. The transcript does not record further implementing detail or effective-date language for enforcement at the time of passage.

","The Oklahoma House passed House Bill 28-29 to prohibit cultivated (lab-grown) meat products from being sold in the state after more than an hour of debate that raised health, religious-liberty and agricultural-competition arguments.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: House advances a package of revenue, banking, licensing and education bills

House advances ODOT land-return bill after lawmakers question look-back language

Oklahoma House bans sale of lab-grown meat after heated debate