Concerns over the potential impact of horse and dog racing dominated the Leominster City Council meeting on March 24, 2025, as residents voiced strong opposition to a proposal that could bring gambling venues to the community.

Rosemarie Quirousas, a local nurse practitioner, highlighted alarming public health research indicating that increased accessibility to gambling could lead to higher rates of gambling-related harms, affecting not only gamblers but their families and the broader community. "The majority of gambling-related harm is experienced by people who do not have gambling disorders," she stated, urging the council to consider the long-term consequences of such venues.

Michael Caputo echoed these sentiments, expressing concern for local children and the ethical implications of horse racing. "Do we want them to be looking at another reminder of a potential way for them to fall into a bad habit?" he questioned, emphasizing the negative effects gambling can have on families.

State Representative Natalie Higgins supported the petition against racing, noting that Massachusetts has a history of prioritizing animal welfare and has previously banned greyhound racing. She pointed out the declining popularity of the racing industry, citing significant financial losses at local tracks over the years.

Residents like Matt Leal and Caitlin Smith also spoke against the proposal, citing animal cruelty and the social costs associated with gambling. Smith argued that the space for a racetrack would be better utilized for community projects that support Leominster's diverse population.

Bill R., a former compulsive gambler, shared his personal story of addiction, warning that new gambling venues could exacerbate existing issues in the community. "Massachusetts does not need a home to foster these addictions," he cautioned.

The overwhelming sentiment among speakers was clear: the introduction of horse and dog racing in Leominster could bring more harm than good. As the council considers the petition to ban these activities, residents are hopeful that their voices will lead to a decision that prioritizes community well-being over potential economic gains.