The Newport City Zoning Board of Review convened on December 24, 2024, to discuss a contentious proposal for a swimming pool at a residential property on K Street. The meeting highlighted significant concerns from neighboring residents regarding potential impacts on drainage, noise, and community relations.
During the session, a resident expressed deep apprehension about the proximity of the proposed pool to their home, noting that the distance between their property lines is minimal. The resident illustrated their concerns with diagrams, emphasizing the potential for water runoff and chemical drainage from the pool to affect their property. They argued that the existing drainage systems in Newport are already strained, and additional impervious surfaces could exacerbate flooding issues in the area.
Another resident, who has lived in the neighborhood for generations, voiced frustration over a perceived lack of communication from the pool's owners. They described instances of dismissive behavior from the neighbors and raised concerns about noise levels during gatherings, particularly when the owners' adult children and their friends are present. The resident highlighted their commitment to the community and the importance of maintaining a peaceful neighborhood environment.
In response, the property owners defended their proposal, stating that they have made efforts to engage with neighbors and address concerns. They noted plans to remove an existing driveway, which would convert impervious surfaces to pervious landscaping, potentially improving drainage in the area. They also mentioned that the pool would include a mitigation system to manage water runoff.
The discussion revealed a broader concern among residents about the cumulative impact of new developments in Newport, particularly in light of predictions for increased rainfall and flooding in the future. One resident referenced a local article discussing the city's vulnerability to climate change, urging the board to consider the long-term implications of adding more impervious surfaces.
As the meeting concluded, the board members acknowledged the complexity of the issues raised and the need for further deliberation. The outcome of the proposal remains uncertain, as community members continue to voice their concerns about the balance between development and neighborhood integrity. The board is expected to revisit the proposal in future sessions, weighing the interests of property owners against the collective concerns of the community.