Oregon's Joint Committee on Ways and Means convened on March 22, 2025, where public education funding emerged as a critical topic, drawing passionate testimonies from parents, educators, and community leaders. The committee heard calls for increased investment in public schools, with advocates urging lawmakers to prioritize education as a fundamental government service.
Suzanne Clark, a parent of a high school student, highlighted the dire situation facing Oregon's public schools, which are set to cut over 200 staff members next year. She emphasized that education is the foundation for reducing violence and improving community safety, arguing that adequate funding could alleviate the need for extensive spending on public safety and mental health services. Clark urged legislators to ensure that the state school fund allocation meets current service levels, reflecting the urgent need for reform after decades of underfunding.
Ashley Schofield, another parent, echoed these sentiments, opposing Senate Bill 5516, which proposes a state school fund of $11.36 billion. She pointed out that despite this being a record amount, it still falls short, leading to significant cuts in Portland Public Schools. Schofield called for a shift in rhetoric around education funding, advocating for a clear acknowledgment that current investments are insufficient and demanding a comprehensive plan to support public education.
Megan Vidal, a school board director, reinforced the need for increased funding, particularly for special education, which she argued is crucial for inclusive education. She noted that the current funding cap for special education is outdated and called for its removal to better support students with diverse needs.
Angela Bonilla, president of the Portland Association of Teachers, stressed the importance of prioritizing education over corporate interests. She urged lawmakers to reform tax policies to ensure that the wealthiest Oregonians contribute their fair share, thereby enabling more substantial investments in public education.
The testimonies underscored a collective demand for systemic change in how Oregon funds its schools, with advocates insisting that without significant reforms, the state risks further deterioration of its education system. As the committee continues its discussions, the implications of these testimonies could shape future funding decisions and educational policies in Oregon, highlighting the urgent need for action to support the state's students and educators.