Massachusetts adds geolocation definition to personal information laws

In the bustling halls of the Massachusetts State House, lawmakers gathered on March 24, 2025, to discuss a pivotal piece of legislation known as House Bill 93. This bill, aimed at enhancing the protection of personal information, seeks to address the growing concerns surrounding data privacy in an increasingly digital world.

At the heart of House Bill 93 is a comprehensive redefinition of what constitutes "personal information." The bill expands the existing framework to include sensitive data such as biometric information, genetic details, health insurance records, and specific geolocation information. This move comes in response to rising incidents of data breaches and identity theft, which have left many residents feeling vulnerable in the face of technological advancements.

One of the most notable provisions of the bill is the inclusion of "specific geolocation information," defined as data that pinpoints an individual's location within a radius of 1,850 feet. This addition reflects a growing recognition of the need to safeguard not just traditional identifiers like Social Security numbers, but also the more nuanced data that can reveal an individual's whereabouts and habits.

As the bill was debated, lawmakers expressed a mix of support and concern. Proponents argued that the legislation is a necessary step toward protecting citizens' privacy rights, especially in an era where personal data is often exploited for commercial gain. Critics, however, raised questions about the potential implications for businesses that rely on location-based services, fearing that stringent regulations could stifle innovation and economic growth.

The economic implications of House Bill 93 are significant. By tightening regulations around data privacy, the bill could lead to increased compliance costs for businesses, particularly small enterprises that may struggle to adapt to the new requirements. On the other hand, advocates believe that stronger privacy protections could enhance consumer trust, ultimately benefiting businesses that prioritize ethical data practices.

As the legislative process unfolds, experts suggest that the outcome of House Bill 93 could set a precedent for data privacy laws across the nation. If passed, Massachusetts could become a leader in the movement toward more robust protections, influencing other states to follow suit. The bill's journey through the legislature will be closely watched, as it not only addresses immediate concerns about personal data security but also shapes the future landscape of privacy rights in the digital age.

In the coming weeks, as discussions continue and amendments are proposed, the fate of House Bill 93 remains uncertain. Yet, one thing is clear: the conversation around data privacy is far from over, and the implications of this legislation could resonate well beyond the borders of Massachusetts.