Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Maryland budget allocates funds for Jessup Correctional Institution services

March 24, 2025 | House Bills (Introduced), 2025 Bills, Maryland Legislation Bills Collections, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Maryland budget allocates funds for Jessup Correctional Institution services
On March 24, 2025, Maryland lawmakers introduced House Bill 350, a budget bill aimed at addressing critical funding needs within the state's correctional facilities. The bill proposes significant adjustments to the General Fund and Special Fund appropriations, specifically targeting inmate medical and mental health services, as well as facility maintenance.

The primary purpose of House Bill 350 is to reallocate funds to better manage the financial demands associated with inmate healthcare, particularly in light of rising costs related to substance abuse treatment. The bill seeks to reduce the General Fund appropriation by $2.5 million, redirecting these funds to the Opioid Restitution Fund to cover inmate medical substance abuse costs. This shift reflects a growing recognition of the need for specialized treatment options within the correctional system.

In addition to the reallocation for substance abuse treatment, the bill includes provisions to supplement the fiscal 2025 budget for the Maryland Correctional Institution in Jessup. This includes an appropriation of approximately $1.4 million to cover medical and mental health contract costs, as well as an additional $1.9 million to address shortfalls from fiscal 2024. Furthermore, the bill allocates $309,339 for facility maintenance contracts, underscoring the importance of maintaining safe and functional environments for both inmates and staff.

Debate surrounding House Bill 350 has centered on the adequacy of funding for mental health services and the effectiveness of current treatment programs within the correctional system. Some lawmakers have expressed concerns about the long-term implications of relying on the Opioid Restitution Fund, questioning whether it will provide sustainable support for the growing needs of the inmate population.

The economic implications of the bill are noteworthy, as the reallocation of funds could impact the overall budget for other state services. Experts suggest that investing in inmate healthcare may lead to long-term savings by reducing recidivism rates and improving public health outcomes. However, critics argue that without comprehensive reforms to the correctional system, these financial adjustments may only serve as temporary fixes.

As House Bill 350 moves through the legislative process, its outcomes could significantly influence the future of correctional healthcare in Maryland. Lawmakers will need to weigh the immediate financial needs against the broader implications for public safety and health, making this bill a focal point of ongoing discussions about criminal justice reform in the state.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI