Become a Founder Member Now!

Legislature proposes $350K for Consumer Protection Division contingent on funding changes

March 24, 2025 | House Bills (Introduced), 2025 Bills, Maryland Legislation Bills Collections, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Legislature proposes $350K for Consumer Protection Division contingent on funding changes
House Bill 350, introduced in Maryland on March 24, 2025, aims to address budgetary allocations for various state divisions, including the Consumer Protection Division and the Antitrust Division. The bill proposes a total appropriation of $350,000, contingent upon the enactment of legislation that would reduce the mandate for general funds in the Consumer Protection Division. This provision is designed to streamline funding and enhance the efficiency of state operations.

Key provisions of House Bill 350 include specific allocations for the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, which is set to receive over $7.9 million in federal and general fund appropriations, and the Independent Investigations Division, which will be allocated nearly $3 million. Additionally, the bill outlines a reduction of $1.17 million in the Civil Litigation Division's general fund appropriation, contingent upon the approval of legislation that would allow the use of the Securities Registration Fund for general agency operations.

The bill has sparked notable discussions among lawmakers, particularly regarding the implications of reallocating funds from established programs to support new initiatives. Some legislators express concern that reducing funding for the Consumer Protection Division could hinder its ability to effectively safeguard Maryland residents. Conversely, proponents argue that the proposed changes will lead to a more balanced budget and better resource management across state agencies.

The economic implications of House Bill 350 are significant, as it seeks to optimize state spending while ensuring that essential services remain funded. If passed, the bill could set a precedent for future budgetary reforms in Maryland, potentially influencing how state funds are allocated across various departments.

As the legislative session progresses, stakeholders are closely monitoring the bill's developments, with potential amendments and debates expected in the coming weeks. The outcome of House Bill 350 could have lasting effects on Maryland's budgetary practices and the operational capabilities of its state divisions.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI