On March 20, 2025, the Village of Palos Park held a joint meeting of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals, focusing on proposed changes to zoning regulations that could significantly impact residential development in the area. The discussions centered around the minimum size requirements for homes on residential lots, particularly the potential reduction from 2,200 square feet to 1,500 square feet.

The primary concern raised by several members was the implications of allowing smaller homes in a community traditionally characterized by larger residences. One commissioner expressed apprehension about changing the current regulations, emphasizing that existing vacant lots could still be developed, albeit with variances. The sentiment was that altering the minimum size could lead to a proliferation of smaller homes, which some believe may not align with the community's character.

Supporters of the proposed change argued that there is a growing trend towards smaller homes, driven by various factors including aging populations seeking more manageable living spaces. They highlighted that allowing smaller homes could preserve open space and reduce impervious surfaces, contributing positively to the environment. One commissioner noted that many residents might prefer to downsize while remaining in Palos Park, suggesting that a 1,500 square foot home could meet their needs without compromising the community's aesthetic.

Despite the arguments for flexibility in home sizes, some members questioned the necessity of the change, pointing out that there had been no significant demand for variances to build smaller homes under the current regulations. This raised the question of whether the existing framework was indeed functioning effectively or if it required revision.

Additionally, the meeting touched on the topic of site visibility in residential areas, with discussions indicating a lack of current regulations addressing this issue. The introduction of guidelines for site visibility was proposed to enhance safety and aesthetics in residential developments.

As the meeting concluded, the commissioners were left to consider the implications of these discussions on future zoning regulations. The outcome of this meeting could shape the residential landscape of Palos Park, balancing the desire for smaller homes with the community's established character and values. Further deliberations are expected as the boards continue to evaluate the proposed changes and their potential impact on the village.