Landlords required to conduct radon tests every five years in residential buildings

This article was created by AI using a key topic of the bill. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the full bill. Link to Bill

On March 21, 2025, the Pennsylvania Legislature introduced Senate Bill 497, aimed at addressing public health concerns related to radon exposure in residential properties. The bill mandates comprehensive testing and remediation measures for radon, a colorless, odorless gas linked to lung cancer, particularly in homes across the state.

The key provisions of Senate Bill 497 require landlords to conduct initial radon tests in their rental properties and implement remediation measures if dangerous levels are detected. Following the initial testing, landlords must conduct subsequent radon tests every five years to ensure ongoing safety. Additionally, the results of these tests must be documented and made available for tenant review, promoting transparency and accountability.

For residential home sellers, the bill stipulates that a radon test must be completed before selling a home, with a deadline set for June 30, 2027, for existing homes. This provision aims to protect prospective buyers from unknowingly purchasing properties with hazardous radon levels.

The introduction of Senate Bill 497 has sparked notable discussions among lawmakers and public health advocates. Supporters argue that the bill is a crucial step in safeguarding public health, particularly in areas known for high radon levels. However, some landlords and real estate professionals have expressed concerns about the financial burden of mandatory testing and remediation, fearing it could lead to increased rental prices and housing costs.

The implications of this legislation are significant. By enforcing regular testing and remediation, the bill seeks to reduce the health risks associated with radon exposure, potentially lowering lung cancer rates in Pennsylvania. Experts suggest that if implemented effectively, the bill could serve as a model for other states grappling with similar public health issues.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, its future remains uncertain. Lawmakers will need to balance public health priorities with the economic concerns of property owners and the real estate market. The outcome of Senate Bill 497 could set a precedent for how states address environmental health risks in residential settings.

Converted from Senate Bill 497 bill
Link to Bill

Comments

    View Bill

    This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

    View Bill