Council recommends denial of South Coast Wind Energy's sound variance request
December 09, 2024 | Portsmouth, Newport County, Rhode Island
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Portsmouth Town Council meeting on December 9, 2024, focused on a significant discussion regarding a sound variance request from South Coast Wind Energy LLC. The council voted to recommend denial of the variance for after-hours work, emphasizing concerns about noise levels in residential areas.
During the meeting, council members clarified that a "yes" vote would indicate a denial of the variance request. However, they also expressed that if the Energy Facility Siting Board (EFSB) were to approve the variance, the council would advise that noise levels be capped at 70 decibels at the affected residential locations. This advisory opinion aims to mitigate potential disturbances to local residents.
The discussion highlighted the council's position on balancing energy development with community well-being. The solicitor present confirmed that the motion to deny the variance, while suggesting a noise limit, was appropriate and within the council's authority.
As the meeting concluded, the council's decision underscored their commitment to addressing residents' concerns while navigating the complexities of energy projects in the area. The next steps will depend on the EFSB's response to the council's recommendations.
During the meeting, council members clarified that a "yes" vote would indicate a denial of the variance request. However, they also expressed that if the Energy Facility Siting Board (EFSB) were to approve the variance, the council would advise that noise levels be capped at 70 decibels at the affected residential locations. This advisory opinion aims to mitigate potential disturbances to local residents.
The discussion highlighted the council's position on balancing energy development with community well-being. The solicitor present confirmed that the motion to deny the variance, while suggesting a noise limit, was appropriate and within the council's authority.
As the meeting concluded, the council's decision underscored their commitment to addressing residents' concerns while navigating the complexities of energy projects in the area. The next steps will depend on the EFSB's response to the council's recommendations.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting