The House Judiciary Committee of the Montana Legislature convened on March 21, 2025, to discuss a contentious bill regarding medical protocols related to gender-affirming care. The meeting featured testimony from various witnesses, including Nikki Grossberg, the Division Administrator for Child and Family Services, who provided an overview of the proceedings.

During the session, Representative Kametz sought clarification from medical professional Janice Reed about the implications of the bill. Reed emphasized that the legislation aims to address concerns over the efficacy and safety of certain medical practices, citing systematic reviews from countries like Sweden, Finland, the UK, and Canada that question the validity of these protocols. She argued that some U.S. doctors may prioritize ideology or financial gain over patient safety, suggesting that legislative intervention is necessary to regulate these practices.

The discussion highlighted a significant divide among committee members regarding the terminology used in the debate. Representative Sharp pointed out the contrasting perspectives on the issue, noting that while some refer to the care as "gender-affirming," others label it as "gender-denying." This division reflects broader societal debates surrounding gender identity and medical treatment.

As the committee continues to deliberate on the bill, the discussions underscore the complexities and sensitivities involved in legislating medical practices related to gender identity. The outcome of this bill could have significant implications for healthcare providers and individuals seeking gender-affirming care in Montana.