Coventry Town Council reviews solicitor contract amid legal expense transparency concerns

Coventry Town Council convened on March 11, 2025, to address pressing legal and financial matters, with a significant focus on the town's legal expenses and the role of the town solicitor. The meeting highlighted ongoing tensions regarding transparency and accountability in legal billing practices.

The council's solicitor, Attorney Angel, opened the discussion by reiterating the importance of adhering to established legal protocols and the implications of the town's charter versus state law. He emphasized that the town's legal practices are governed by the Rhode Island Supreme Court's rules, which take precedence over local charter provisions. This clarification set the stage for a heated debate about the council's access to detailed legal billing information.

Councilwoman Blank raised concerns about the lack of transparency in legal expenses related to Johnson's Pond, questioning why the finance director could not provide a comprehensive list of legal costs. She expressed frustration over the perceived limitations on council members' access to information, citing charter section 10.14, which mandates pre-audit of all bills by the treasurer.

The solicitor responded by explaining that while the council receives summary invoices, detailed billing information is considered privileged and not subject to public disclosure. This distinction sparked further debate among council members, with some advocating for greater access to billing details to ensure accountability.

Councilman Copley and others echoed the call for transparency, suggesting that the current review process, which limits access to certain council members, could be improved. They proposed involving the town manager in the review of legal invoices to enhance oversight while balancing the need for confidentiality in ongoing legal matters.

The discussion underscored a broader concern about the town's legal expenses, with reports indicating that the legal department had exceeded its budget by $352,000 in the previous fiscal year. This financial strain prompted calls for a reevaluation of how legal costs are managed and reported.

As the meeting progressed, the solicitor defended his billing practices, asserting that they align with industry standards and are designed to protect the town from potential liabilities. He cautioned against disclosing sensitive information that could compromise ongoing legal matters, emphasizing the need for a careful balance between transparency and legal prudence.

The council's deliberations reflect an ongoing struggle to navigate the complexities of municipal governance, legal accountability, and the imperative for transparency. As discussions continue, the council faces the challenge of fostering trust among its members while ensuring the town's legal and financial integrity is upheld. The implications of these discussions will likely resonate in future council meetings as they seek to refine their processes and enhance public confidence in local governance.