Residents oppose semiconductor factory near West Lafayette residential areas citing health risks

The Tippecanoe County Area Plan Commission convened on March 19, 2025, to discuss significant community concerns regarding the proposed industrial developments in the area, particularly the implications of rezoning land for semiconductor manufacturing.

The meeting began with a presentation from a concerned resident who shared a personal account of a past incident involving hazardous chemicals in a research facility in Germany. The speaker emphasized the dangers of highly combustible chemicals and the potential for catastrophic events, citing a fire that led to widespread evacuation due to toxic gas emissions. This account underscored fears about the safety of transporting such materials through populated neighborhoods, particularly near schools and residential areas.

Following this, Deborah Ellis, a local resident, urged the commission to reconsider the proposed industrial zoning, highlighting the negative impact similar industries have had on communities elsewhere. She referenced a recent Senate Bill in Oregon that indicated a reluctance among potential residents to live near semiconductor plants due to health risks. Ellis expressed concern over the proximity of new housing developments to the proposed industrial site, questioning the thoroughness of the commission's research into the potential hazards posed by the semiconductor manufacturing process.

Ellis also reported on her outreach efforts within the community, noting that a significant number of residents opposed the rezoning. She articulated worries about the health implications for families living close to the proposed site, particularly for children and vulnerable populations. The discussion included concerns about increased truck traffic and the associated risks of transporting hazardous materials through residential areas.

Another resident, Riti Roy, briefly addressed the commission, expressing her long-standing ties to the community and her apprehensions regarding the proposed industrial developments. While she did not present scientific data, her remarks reflected a broader sentiment of unease among residents about the potential health and environmental impacts of the planned industrial activities.

The meeting concluded with a clear call from community members for the commission to prioritize the health and safety of residents over industrial development. The discussions highlighted a growing tension between economic development and community well-being, with residents advocating for more thorough evaluations and alternative site considerations for the proposed industrial projects. The commission is expected to take these concerns into account as they move forward with their decision-making process.