Marshall advocates for pausing raise the age amid concerns for 19 year olds in custody
March 22, 2025 | Judiciary, SENATE, Committees, Legislative , Vermont
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Vermont Senate Judiciary Committee convened on March 21, 2025, to discuss pressing issues surrounding the treatment of 19-year-olds in the criminal justice system, particularly in light of the upcoming implementation of a policy to raise the age of juvenile jurisdiction. The meeting highlighted significant concerns regarding the safety and well-being of young individuals entering the adult correctional system.
Marshall, a representative from the Department of Corrections, emphasized the need for a pause in the policy's implementation due to inadequate resources and support systems currently in place. He expressed that while the intention behind raising the age is commendable, the reality of the situation poses risks to vulnerable youth. He noted that many 19-year-olds entering custody may face unsafe conditions, particularly in adult facilities that lack the necessary therapeutic support.
The discussion also touched on the broader implications of the policy, with various stakeholders, including attorneys and mental health providers, voicing their apprehensions. Concerns were raised about the potential for increased harm to those with profound mental health needs, who may not receive appropriate care in an adult setting. Marshall pointed out that while the majority of youth may navigate the system without issue, it is the marginal cases that could lead to significant problems.
The committee acknowledged the stress on community partners and the judicial system, with many organizations reporting challenges since recent policy changes. The consensus among several members was that the current environment is not conducive to such an expansion of juvenile jurisdiction, as many systems are already strained.
In conclusion, the committee's discussions underscored the urgent need for a careful evaluation of the resources available before moving forward with the policy to raise the age. The focus remains on ensuring the safety and proper treatment of young individuals within the justice system, with a call for more robust support structures to be established before any changes are implemented.
Marshall, a representative from the Department of Corrections, emphasized the need for a pause in the policy's implementation due to inadequate resources and support systems currently in place. He expressed that while the intention behind raising the age is commendable, the reality of the situation poses risks to vulnerable youth. He noted that many 19-year-olds entering custody may face unsafe conditions, particularly in adult facilities that lack the necessary therapeutic support.
The discussion also touched on the broader implications of the policy, with various stakeholders, including attorneys and mental health providers, voicing their apprehensions. Concerns were raised about the potential for increased harm to those with profound mental health needs, who may not receive appropriate care in an adult setting. Marshall pointed out that while the majority of youth may navigate the system without issue, it is the marginal cases that could lead to significant problems.
The committee acknowledged the stress on community partners and the judicial system, with many organizations reporting challenges since recent policy changes. The consensus among several members was that the current environment is not conducive to such an expansion of juvenile jurisdiction, as many systems are already strained.
In conclusion, the committee's discussions underscored the urgent need for a careful evaluation of the resources available before moving forward with the policy to raise the age. The focus remains on ensuring the safety and proper treatment of young individuals within the justice system, with a call for more robust support structures to be established before any changes are implemented.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting