Resident Hunt alleges seawall alterations cause neighborhood flooding crisis

The Collier County government meeting held on February 26, 2025, addressed significant concerns regarding local flooding and property disputes. The session featured a detailed presentation from a resident, Mr. Hunt, who raised alarms about ongoing flooding issues linked to alterations made to a seawall by a neighboring property owner.

Mr. Hunt described how the unauthorized modifications, including the installation of a drain pipe, have exacerbated flooding conditions in the area. He reported that water now flows through his driveway and has filled a nearby field, creating a distressing situation for local residents. He emphasized the urgency of the matter, stating that he has been involved in long-term litigation regarding these issues.

During his remarks, Mr. Hunt expressed frustration over what he termed a "disparity of enforcement" regarding building regulations. He mentioned multiple complaints he had filed with local authorities, specifically naming John Johnson, a senior building inspector. Mr. Hunt claimed that the seawall repairs were conducted by unlicensed contractors, raising concerns about the safety and legality of the work.

As Mr. Hunt continued to outline his grievances, he suggested that the actions of the construction companies involved might be part of a larger strategy to flood the neighborhood. He urged the commission to take his concerns seriously and hold those responsible accountable.

The meeting moderator, recognizing the complexity of Mr. Hunt's claims, suggested that he meet with his district commissioner for further discussion. However, Mr. Hunt insisted on documenting his concerns in the official record, indicating that he would continue to advocate for accountability in future meetings.

The session concluded with a commitment to revisit the issues raised, highlighting the ongoing challenges faced by residents in the Bayshore area regarding flooding and property management. The commission's next steps remain to be determined as they consider the implications of Mr. Hunt's testimony.