Ohio bill limits damages for malicious deepfake recordings

Ohio's House Bill 185, introduced on March 19, 2025, aims to address the growing concern over malicious deepfake technology by establishing a framework for civil remedies against its misuse. This legislation seeks to protect individuals from the harmful effects of deepfake recordings, which can distort reality and damage reputations.

Key provisions of the bill include the ability for victims to seek statutory damages without the need for a criminal conviction related to the violation. If the value of the deepfake involved exceeds $150,000, the maximum statutory damages are capped at $15,000. Additionally, the bill allows for the recovery of attorney's fees and court costs for the prevailing party, enhancing the accessibility of legal recourse for victims.

A notable aspect of House Bill 185 is its provision for the destruction or removal of malicious deepfake content. Courts can mandate defendants to take affirmative steps to eliminate such recordings and may require them to cover any expenses incurred by the plaintiff in the removal process. This proactive approach underscores the bill's intent to not only provide compensation but also to mitigate the ongoing harm caused by deepfakes.

The introduction of this bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Supporters argue that it is a necessary step to combat the misuse of technology that can lead to severe personal and professional repercussions. Critics, however, express concerns about potential overreach and the implications for free speech, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of how such laws are enforced.

The implications of House Bill 185 extend beyond individual cases; they touch on broader social and political issues surrounding digital privacy and the integrity of information. As deepfake technology continues to evolve, the bill represents a legislative effort to adapt to these challenges and protect citizens from emerging threats.

As the Ohio Legislature moves forward with deliberations on this bill, its outcomes could set a precedent for how states address the complexities of digital misinformation and personal rights in the age of technology. The ongoing discussions will be crucial in shaping the final form of the legislation and its effectiveness in safeguarding individuals against the misuse of deepfake technology.