Concerns over a proposed multifamily development in Citrus County's coastal high hazard area dominated discussions at the Planning and Development Commission meeting on October 17, 2024. The board ultimately voted against the application, citing significant worries about evacuation times, environmental impact, and community compatibility.

Commissioner Facemeyer expressed strong opposition, highlighting the area's existing flooding issues and the potential for worsening conditions. "I can appreciate their comments and their concerns," he stated, referring to local residents who voiced their apprehensions about the project.

Commissioner Sherra echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the critical nature of the location adjacent to evacuation zones. He noted that while some compatibility issues had been addressed, the overriding concerns about evacuation and traffic access were paramount. "The issues of density and road access also come into play," he remarked.

Commissioner Stone reinforced the board's commitment to environmental protections, particularly regarding wetlands, stating that the applicant had ample room to comply with the required setbacks. He, too, expressed his disapproval of the project, aligning with the staff's recommendation against it.

Despite the pressing need for workforce housing in Citrus County, as pointed out by Commissioner Bramblett, the board remained firm in its decision. Bramblett acknowledged the housing shortage but raised concerns about the project's design and its implications for local traffic and flooding.

In a final motion, the commission found the application inconsistent with the Citrus County comprehensive plan and recommended its denial to the Board of County Commissioners. The decision reflects ongoing challenges in balancing development needs with environmental and community safety in the region. As the board looks ahead, discussions on identifying suitable areas for future developments are expected to intensify.