The Michigan Legislature's Subcommittee on Weaponization of State Government convened on March 19, 2025, to address critical issues surrounding the role of state attorneys general and their interactions with federal authorities. The meeting featured discussions led by Representative Wolford, who opened with a light-hearted remark about assorted candies before transitioning to serious inquiries regarding the implications of state litigation against the federal government.

Wolford emphasized the importance of understanding the potential consequences of frequent lawsuits initiated by an attorney general's office against federal entities. He posed two key questions: the impact of such litigation on the rule of law and whether excessive legal actions could undermine it.

In response, General Cox provided insights into the current landscape of federal litigation, highlighting a trend where litigants seek favorable district courts to challenge federal policies. He noted that this practice can lead to nationwide injunctions issued by a single judge, which may hinder the enforcement of policies elected officials are mandated to implement. Cox pointed out that this phenomenon has been observed more frequently under the Trump administration, where rulings from individual judges in various states have stalled federal policies for extended periods, sometimes lasting years.

The discussion underscored concerns about the judicial system's integrity and the potential for politicization within the courts. The representatives acknowledged the delicate balance between state and federal powers and the implications of litigation strategies that could disrupt governance.

The meeting concluded with a recognition of the need for ongoing dialogue about the role of state attorneys general in the broader context of federalism and the rule of law. Further discussions are anticipated as the subcommittee continues to explore these pressing issues.