During the recent Clarkdale Council Regular Meeting held on January 14, 2025, significant discussions centered around waste management services, particularly the potential for increased costs associated with curbside recycling. The council members expressed concerns regarding the current waste management contract and the implications of possibly going out to bid for recycling services.
The meeting highlighted that estimates from waste management suggest that the cost for curbside recycling could potentially double the current rate. Council members noted that even with this increase, Clarkdale's rates would still be lower than those in many other communities. For instance, some neighboring areas charge between $10 to $16 per household for similar services, while one council member referenced a personal experience in Colorado where rates reached $22 to $25 per month.
A key point of contention arose regarding the decision to either renew the existing contract with Waste Management or to seek bids from other providers. Town Manager Guthrie clarified that if the council opts to go out to bid, they would lose the opportunity to lock in the current low rates, which were established during the last bidding process. This raised concerns among council members about the potential for increased costs if they pursued a new contract.
Community input was also a focal point of the discussion. Resident Mary Lou Rose advocated for transparency and suggested that going out to bid would provide objective pricing information for residents to consider. The council acknowledged the importance of understanding the financial implications of their decisions, especially in light of rising costs nationwide.
Additionally, council members discussed the need for improved recycling practices within the community. Suggestions included separating trash and recycling services and potentially implementing bulk pickup days to reduce landfill waste. The council recognized that while many residents express a desire to recycle, actual participation rates are often lower, indicating a need for better education and resources to facilitate recycling efforts.
In conclusion, the council's discussions underscored the complexities of waste management in Clarkdale, balancing cost concerns with community needs for recycling services. As the council moves forward, they will need to weigh the benefits of maintaining their current contract against the potential advantages of exploring new options, all while considering the financial impact on residents. The next steps will likely involve further discussions on how to best serve the community's waste management needs while keeping costs manageable.