Illinois lawmakers have introduced House Bill 3678, a significant piece of legislation aimed at revising hunting license fees and regulations in the state. The bill, presented on March 19, 2025, seeks to streamline the licensing process while providing financial relief to certain groups, including senior citizens and veterans.
At the heart of House Bill 3678 is a restructuring of hunting license fees. Residents will now pay $57 for an annual hunting license, with an option for a three-year license available at three times the annual fee. Notably, residents aged 65 and older, as well as resident veterans returning from service, will benefit from a reduced fee—half the cost of the three-year license—provided they can verify their military service.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The bill also introduces a nonresident hunting license priced at $35, valid for up to ten consecutive days, and a special license for nonresidents to hunt on game breeding preserves at the same fee as residents. Additionally, the legislation mandates a $15 fee for a State Migratory Waterfowl Stamp and a $5 fee for a State Habitat Stamp, both of which are waived for residents over 75 years old.
Debate surrounding the bill has focused on its potential economic implications, particularly for local wildlife management and conservation efforts. Supporters argue that the fee adjustments will encourage more participation in hunting, which can aid in wildlife population control and habitat preservation. Critics, however, express concerns about the sustainability of funding for conservation programs, which rely heavily on stamp and license sales.
As House Bill 3678 moves through the legislative process, its proponents are optimistic about its passage, citing the need for updated regulations that reflect current economic conditions and demographic changes. If enacted, the bill could reshape the landscape of hunting in Illinois, making it more accessible while ensuring that conservation efforts remain funded and effective. The next steps will involve further discussions and potential amendments as lawmakers weigh the bill's broader implications for the state's wildlife management strategy.