Senate examines pay parity between prosecutors and defense attorneys in unrepresented crisis

March 19, 2025 | Public Safety, Ways and Means, Joint, Committees, Legislative, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate examines pay parity between prosecutors and defense attorneys in unrepresented crisis
Oregon's Joint Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Public Safety has highlighted a critical issue affecting the state's legal system: the disparity in pay between prosecutors and defense attorneys. During a recent meeting, members discussed how this pay gap contributes to a growing crisis of unrepresented individuals in the legal system, particularly in six counties facing significant challenges.

The committee examined findings from Senate Bill 337, which mandated an economic analysis of hourly compensation for district attorneys (DAs) and public defenders. The results revealed considerable fluctuations in pay across different jurisdictions. While public defenders often earn less than DAs, in some areas, their salaries can be equal to or even exceed those of prosecutors. This inconsistency has led to a troubling trend where many prosecutors leave their positions for better-paying roles in public defense.

Representative Chilton raised concerns about the impact of these compensation disparities on the unrepresented crisis, particularly in counties like Coos and Curry. In Curry County, for instance, the persistent vacancy of an Assistant District Attorney position has been attributed to low compensation, further exacerbating the issue of unrepresented individuals in the legal system.

The committee acknowledged that underfunding in the district attorney's offices hampers their ability to effectively process cases, which in turn affects public defense services. The discussions underscored the need for a comprehensive approach to address these disparities and ensure that all parts of the legal system are adequately supported.

As the committee continues to explore solutions, the implications of these discussions are clear: addressing pay parity is essential for improving the efficiency of the legal system and ensuring that all individuals have access to representation. The next steps will involve further analysis and potential policy recommendations aimed at resolving these critical issues.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Oregon articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI