Oregon's House Committee on Rules convened on March 19, 2025, to discuss significant reforms aimed at enhancing the state's electoral process. A key focus of the meeting was House Bill 3166, which proposes a unified primary system designed to ensure that all voters, regardless of party affiliation, have a voice in selecting candidates for the general election.

Sarah Wolk, executive director of the Equal Vote Coalition, expressed support for the bill's intent but raised concerns about the lack of specificity regarding the voting method to be used in general elections. She emphasized the importance of preventing vote splitting and recommended that the bill include provisions to ensure that the chosen voting method accommodates all ballot data and adheres to election security best practices.

Tom Archer, a retired educator, advocated for a top-four primary system, suggesting that it would simplify the voting process and minimize errors. He highlighted that this approach could enhance voter understanding and participation, making elections more competitive.

Robert Close, a retired physics professor, criticized the potential for vote splitting under the current proposal and suggested a top-three primary system, which he argued would better reflect voter preferences without requiring complex rankings.

Courtney Russell, a supporter of the original bill, urged the committee to consider moving Oregon's presidential primary to the first Tuesday in March. She argued that this change would empower voters and ensure their influence in national elections, rather than merely ratifying decisions made by earlier primary states.

The discussions underscored a collective desire among committee members and witnesses to reform Oregon's electoral system to foster greater inclusivity and representation. As the committee continues to deliberate on these proposals, the implications for Oregon's electoral landscape could be profound, potentially reshaping how candidates are selected and how voters engage in the democratic process.