Elliot Maltz critiques private equity investment transparency in Oregon's PERS system

March 19, 2025 | Finance and Revenue, Senate, Committees, Legislative, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Elliot Maltz critiques private equity investment transparency in Oregon's PERS system
In a recent meeting of the Oregon Senate Committee on Finance and Revenue, discussions centered around the implications of private equity investments, particularly in relation to the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) and fossil fuel investments. The meeting featured testimony from Elliot Maltz, a member of Third Act Oregon, who emphasized the inherent risks and lack of transparency associated with private equity transactions.

Maltz, drawing on his extensive experience as a marketing professor, highlighted the fundamental issues of information asymmetry in market transactions. He pointed out that when private equity firms engage with PERS, the potential for unequal knowledge creates a significant disadvantage for the state. This lack of transparency raises concerns about the fairness of these financial dealings, particularly when the firms may not fully disclose the risks involved.

Moreover, Maltz expressed skepticism about the long-term forecasts provided by private equity firms, especially those projecting outcomes over a decade or more. He argued that investments in fossil fuels, which often rely on such long-term predictions, pose a fiduciary risk. He urged the committee to reconsider any further investments in fossil fuels, not only from an ethical standpoint regarding climate change but also from a financial perspective, suggesting that relying on potentially flawed forecasts is a precarious strategy for managing public funds.

The meeting also included testimony from Derek Sangston, policy director and counsel for Oregon Business and Industry, indicating that the discussions were part of a broader examination of the state's investment strategies and their implications for public employees.

As the committee continues to evaluate these critical issues, the discussions underscore the need for transparency and caution in investment decisions that affect the financial security of public employees in Oregon. The outcomes of these deliberations could have lasting impacts on the state's investment policies and the management of public funds.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Oregon articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI