[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6123860,"mediaKeyId","2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc","parentId",2687501,"title","Omaha City Council roundup: liquor licenses, plats and routine measures approved; a few items laid over","audioSeconds",3485,"startMs",455000,"endMs",3940000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc&start=455&end=3940","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc/thumbnail_455000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6123860/Omaha/Douglas-County/Nebraska/Omaha-City-Council-roundup-liquor-licenses-plats-and-routine-measures-approved-a-few-items-laid-over","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6123860-cf7a4770401a6edae3e9f07f9c5a7c0d/orig.mp4?Expires=1771129270&Signature=aUFagrUyI7uePGBknt9sUt25M1KmHUmpE1WIfzaugd3l128JAw08dXHRCxHErIVSsRv3AYAE1xWBcfQEE~I0~TPIWDDt1PvaR2LD6RXhqLAI8aCkXzTauZrgXOEDUYQ5DdMxOP~PVFleY0NcB-qMOXACfTqGNWRlZy6asrp8rUS21DlVEFIp-aRjTaHDCegxZNp9PutmXd9npAVE6QxzI8sR~Y4EkKGi1j6L9RZzJaCs4awALh-1P6YXSx3AekRfquV6mOUsA5QKXuzC1TeeQzvWiTh3ee76Y~3qwP~5Jt5Ic4g7mr0mT3igftYNYdTbUXw4IiagEHNZuW6mcL7AzA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City Council of Omaha, NE","date","2025-03-12T13:19:55Z","article","The Omaha City Council’s March 18 meeting included a mix of routine approvals, contested hearings, and follow-up actions. Major outcomes included approvals of several liquor licenses, multiple land-use plats and rezones, adoption of personnel and contract extensions, a statutory hearing dismissal, and one high-profile layover. Key items and votes are summarized below.

Liquor licenses and related votes
- Terra Gaucha Brazilian Steakhouse (Class C, 13851 First National Bank Pkwy): Approved, roll call 7–0.
- No Good (Class I, 3528 Center St., brunch/bagel concept): Approved, roll call 7–0.
- Thai Kitchen (Class II, 16909 Lakeside Hills Plaza): Approved, roll call 7–0.
- Cantina Sol transfer (Don Gabby’s Sports Bar Class C transfer to 1919 Missouri Ave.): Approved, roll call 7–0.
- Warhorse Casino (liquor-license addition for expansion at 6303 Q St.): Amendment to describe revised floor areas adopted 7–0; final approval as amended 7–0.
- Y Family Convenience Store (Class D, 7102 N. 30th St.): Council laid the item over one week to allow negotiations between the applicant and neighborhood (vote to lay over passed 6–1). A prior motion to deny was made and later withdrawn.

Land-use and plats (selected)
- Schouler Replat (prelim & final plat; tied to special-use permit for recycling/crushing): Approved 6–1. (See article on dust and enforcement.)
- South Farm Replat 3 (prelim plat): Approved 7–0.
- McArdle Ridge, Sunrise, Bluestem Prairie, Mason Place Rose, Ridge/Harrison, Bedford Heights and multiple subdivision approvals and related rezones: All received planning-board recommendations and were approved by the council (many votes 7–0; see minutes for each item).
- Elmington Subdivision (293-unit LIHTC apartments; rezoning, PUD overlay, plats and subdivision agreement): Approved 6–1 (Councilmember Johnson voted no). (See separate article on the Elmington controversy.)

Statutory and enforcement items
- Complaint under Neb. Rev. Stat. 53-134.04 against Pacific Convenience Mart: Dismissed by the council, 7–0, after testimony from neighboring property owners and the store’s representatives. Council urged both sides to cooperate and asked city staff and homeless-services teams to follow up.

Contracts, personnel and administrative matters
- Multi-year contract extensions with FCC Environmental Services for yard-waste collection and recycling-drop processing: Council approved five-year extensions.
- Multiple personnel-classification adjustments (HVAC technician, librarian pay, mechanical inspector pay ranges, police/fire labor agreements): Council approved recommended changes from the personnel board.
- Miscellaneous procurement ordinances (e.g., sludge-dewatering polymer purchase, other public-works items) proceeded on consent or by single vote with staff present to answer questions.

Process notes and next steps
- The council repeatedly encouraged neighbors and applicants in contested hearings to meet outside the chamber to attempt negotiated solutions before final recommendations or appeals to state agencies.
- Where council approved plats or rezones tied to permits (for example the Schouler replat), staff noted final issuance of permits is contingent on completion of outstanding conditions such as air-quality approvals and specific site improvements.

Ending: The meeting combined routine agenda business with a handful of contentious land-use and licensing matters. Several contested items were advanced with explicit statements from councilmembers that any subsequent noncompliance would prompt enforcement or show-cause proceedings.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Omaha Nebraska City Council meeting March 11, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Council approved multiple liquor licenses, plats and zoning requests, passed personnel and contract extensions, dismissed a statutory liquor complaint, and laid over a contested convenience-store liquor application for one week to allow neighborhood negotiation.","taxTitle","Omaha, Douglas County, Nebraska","taxId",2556,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6123865,"Council approves 293-unit Elmington apartments in North Omaha over neighborhood objections",2221,10995000,13216000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc&start=10995&end=13216","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc/thumbnail_10995000.jpg","/articles/6123865/Omaha/Douglas-County/Nebraska/Council-approves-293-unit-Elmington-apartments-in-North-Omaha-over-neighborhood-objections","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6123865-820949bcc6741ae2a020f9422746fc0c/orig.mp4?Expires=1771129270&Signature=hm7zpxqXAcG0~wLSZgHaqP9Wx6HtlBZkAHVtXXmyFqyNDTeFfyay8gnS98Rgx3xdYCtvtTcBSEkrkewDL0nYqaiX6~81ziwK6Fky60MuYHc~3ya8NI~If2FkR~R7TXb4PDnWe2THw1t7oy6-gXsg09LOjoDGZ-eha-Ne14j~ztHycAfpAACgoqQYJbvI1Bq7BWRr31Klbkt3P3Vg8gaZDEvuT5P7ucq6RqHjsLakc6DbyYtHDVxd9RW7a51gkQnL9Lx3PkU~sAcgpGenm65soQQGTYdYXTO7ak5JvVldKiBPTsWwd-XDmDu02f1~sgsjWEH8pfB8ZKLBzlhez0Cw3g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The City Council on March 18 approved a rezoning, planned-unit development and related plats for a proposed 293-unit apartment complex (items 37–41) near North 50th and Kansas Avenue, a Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) project developers described as low-density residential under the city’s land-use map.

The proposal drew dozens of opponents at the public hearing who cited traffic safety along Kansas Avenue and Sorensen Parkway, the proximity of building exits to existing homes, and worries about property values, crime and the operator’s record. Speakers presented petitions and online reviews they said indicated problematic management at some of the developer’s other properties elsewhere in the country.

Developer and staff response: Elmington Capital’s representatives and consultant Larry Jobin said the project is consistent with the city’s master plan for low-density residential development, will include 8 three-story buildings, a clubhouse, pool, dog park and more than 120 perimeter trees, and proposed a mix of 1-, 2- and 3-bedroom units with rents targeted at affordable levels (developer figures: one-bedroom about $1,124; two-bedroom about $1,359; three-bedroom about $1,572). Traffic and landscaping plans were reviewed by city staff and planning board with favorable recommendations.

Why it mattered: Opponents said the chosen site is predominantly single-family and that the scale of the proposed housing and the anticipated vehicle trips would worsen existing traffic safety problems — several speakers said accidents are frequent on Sorensen and Kansas — and that the neighborhood has unique environmental/park values including local wildlife.

Council debate and vote: Councilmembers engaged neighbors and staff on traffic counts, the proposed four-way stop and additional on-site access points designed to disperse traffic, and on the project’s LIHTC financing that allows enhanced amenities while keeping rents below market rates. Councilmember Milton urged recognition of citywide housing needs and affordability goals; other members said they understood neighbors’ concerns but noted the project’s compliance with the master plan and planning department recommendations. The council voted 6–1 to approve the project; Councilmember Johnson cast the lone no vote, citing neighborhood fit and traffic concerns.

Follow-up: Public Works agreed to compile accident-history data for the nearby intersections upon request; city staff said landscaping and the PUD conditions will be binding and subject to enforcement. The developer said construction would start in early 2026 with completion in late 2027.

Ending: The approval moves forward a large, city-supported affordable housing development while underscoring continuing tension between neighborhood preservation and the council’s stated goals to expand affordable housing supply across Omaha.","The Omaha City Council approved a 293-unit Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment complex in North Omaha despite widespread neighborhood opposition over traffic, safety and compatibility with single-family homes. The measure passed 6–1; Councilmember Johnson voted no.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6123869,"After months of neighbor complaints about dust, council approves Schouler replat but warns operator on enforcement",980,7009000,7989000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc&start=7009&end=7989","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc/thumbnail_7009000.jpg","/articles/6123869/Omaha/Douglas-County/Nebraska/After-months-of-neighbor-complaints-about-dust-council-approves-Schouler-replat-but-warns-operator-on-enforcement","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6123869-9c1e8b48b04866ddb74d26cc47dbde32/orig.mp4?Expires=1771129270&Signature=YkkVANGE0~aEsoWuyo2YzuOG19rjAe3WUB8Fc~uC77KES4Ig6XZdTpU8Gp-vcwd52~vr8-JHCe~~ZY7BJ2ylVtXCNIM6r8IQ9RUKoCjmviV5LW-H31jazwRQuFV3DfT9sxh1m37VFu3u08lMSWgPrP8VALeKAFwazKNVcnOu6ub4hnnCm2BQ9eRUlEm2huwlKJFvSk6mdXFXIE2nTuJPvO4oSx~WaffGG3eGykxt8q7bTtNN-4IXN6f~WkKM2pkScYj2a1bM3v6fnyigEL4paxaaBAZaYDvx0uXGNwGKmG~ZbYq7bpQCJKtYd4quZmSjN8x8aOS9pa5jQjgtFImQqQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Omaha City Council on March 18 approved the Schouler Replat (items 16 and 17) that is tied to a special-use permit for recycling and crushing operations, despite extended public testimony about significant dust, truck traffic and alleged operations that ran without required air-quality oversight.

Neighbors including John Senowicki described months-long operations last year that they said included concrete crushing, heavy dust plumes and repeated violations of dust-suppression promises. Senowicki told the council he saw “the dust bowl of Sheelytown” in 2024 and reported video and photo evidence to city staff.

Operator response and city oversight: Lance Paulson, CEO of Crushing It, acknowledged the complaints and said the company had mismanaged dust suppression at the start of operations: “Clearly, we did not operate very well. ... Our dust suppression ... was not working. We had a new crew there, did not operate it properly.” Paulson told council the company stopped crushing after being told to do so, has been building required site improvements — fencing, paving and removal of an old grain tower — and said an air-quality permitting process is underway with a public hearing scheduled on March 24.

Planning and enforcement context: Planning staff told council the special-use permit had been approved previously but the final plat was a required condition before the permit could be issued. Planning Director Dave Fanzl confirmed that because the permit had not yet been issued, some enforcement avenues were limited while staff investigated complaints. Council members asked whether the city could issue citations or fines; planning staff said they had limited enforcement tools for the interim but that replat approval would allow the city to issue the special-use permit and then more readily enforce the permit conditions, including pursuing show-cause hearings if violations continued.

Council debate and vote: Several council members expressed strong frustration at the admitted unauthorized crushing and repeated complaints. Councilmember Harding said he had “no sympathy” for further noncompliance and made the motion to approve the preliminary and final plats as the final procedural step necessary to issue the special-use permit; he warned that any new violations would prompt swift review, show-cause proceedings and potential revocation. The council approved the plats 6–1 (Councilmember Johnson opposed), with the record showing multiple council members emphasizing enforcement teeth if standards are not met.

Why it matters: Neighbors described health and nuisance impacts from silica-laden dust, truck traffic, and the apparent absence of required air-quality permits during crushing operations. The council’s action clears the way for the special-use permit to be issued when the remaining permitting conditions (including air-quality approvals) are satisfied, and council members said they would move quickly to revoke or suspend the permit if fresh violations are documented.

Follow-up: Planning staff said they will monitor compliance, and council members urged neighbors to report any further dust or noncompliance immediately so staff can act. The operator said it is pausing crushing activity while completing required site improvements and finalizing air-quality approvals.

Ending: Approval of the replat was paired with warnings and an explicit expectation of compliance; unlike earlier months of unauthorized crushing, council members said they will not tolerate repeat violations and pledged to use show-cause and revocation tools if necessary.","The City Council approved a replat tied to a special-use permit and the Crushing It recycling operation after neighbors described months of illegal crushing, dust and truck traffic. Council members and planning staff stressed that further violations could lead to revocation of the permitted use.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6123873,"Council dismisses complaint against Pacific Convenience Mart after neighbors describe loitering and litter",5222,1660000,6882000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc&start=1660&end=6882","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc/thumbnail_1660000.jpg","/articles/6123873/Omaha/Douglas-County/Nebraska/Council-dismisses-complaint-against-Pacific-Convenience-Mart-after-neighbors-describe-loitering-and-litter","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6123873-26cf57efaa94069b070fe9ab18a1039b/orig.mp4?Expires=1771129270&Signature=LkbDiNzS2ZOEihtN2qaJePccYo0egqCkJkXU5hd~AEDKivuiAnmjoJ9owpLv~UHOzn5-J7zDoo~qwCW0QLINz1Tu-E1sqg2kihg3hAcsf7p6nn-M3B7ukGztAscewK7Hyc61kERfdBIgUWg3lC-frmdJYIBJozBP8Bh6DRC~UcU7g9W~oLHPBeND3fXUACSgOIXXfFQS1UOq58P2LBJ2LGZCHNmyRSYWWgtE9TERGprOBbZM0A4gilOrkbBqo~PVno33dNpRLh4A5uqm5-FqxdcuuJTiHNwpdZ-p~YhcHSU5l5kWkSs8mTe7VswGJ1Oh75kPBxe-JGXIZgW~zkUiUQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Omaha City Council dismissed a complaint on March 18 alleging that Pacific Convenience Mart was fueling public nuisance problems—specifically, sales of single-serve “shooters,” public intoxication, litter and loitering—after hours of testimony from nearby property managers and tenants.

Proponents representing nearby property owners told the council their buildings, tenants and customers had been repeatedly affected. Noah Huber, a property manager for nearby commercial buildings, said the site had drawn intoxicated individuals and that managers and tenants had repeatedly found small liquor containers and other litter on adjacent properties. Mike Huber, owner of a neighboring retail strip, said the store had become “a magnet drawing homeless people” and that his team had photographed hundreds of small liquor containers scattered across adjacent lots.

The store owner’s counsel disputed the claim that his client caused the problems, said his client had not received prior notice about the complaints, and offered to meet with neighbors to address safety or litter issues. The convenience store owner testified they keep multiple exterior cameras and said they regularly clean around the site.

Legal context and council action: The hearing was convened under Nebraska Revised Statute 53-134.04, which allows city councils to hear complaints that a retail liquor licensee is violating the Nebraska Liquor Control Act or Liquor Commission rules. Deputy City Attorney Ryan Wiesen summarized the council’s procedural options, including dismissal, referral to the state Liquor Control Commission to require a new long-form license application, or recommendation of suspension or revocation for more serious violations.

After hearing evidence from both sides, Councilwoman Milton moved to dismiss the complaint. She said the record did not show sufficient evidence tying the litter and loitering specifically to sales by the Pacific Convenience Mart rather than other nearby outlets. The council voted unanimously, 7–0, to dismiss the complaint while urging neighbors and the store to meet and asking city resources (including the homeless services team) to follow up on loitering and public-safety concerns.

Why it matters: Neighbors said the pattern of public intoxication and litter had harmed tenants and visitors to nearby offices and retail; the council’s dismissal means no immediate regulatory sanctions were imposed, but council members and staff pressed both sides to cooperate and flagged enforcement options if violations persist.

Follow-up and enforcement mechanisms: Council members encouraged complainants to call the nonemergency police line or the city’s homeless-services coordinator when public-safety or encampment issues arise. The council also recorded that a dismissal does not bar a future complaint: citizens may refile if additional or stronger evidence is developed.

Ending: Council members framed the vote as a call to local problem-solving and said they would revisit enforcement if substantiated, ongoing violations are documented.","City Council dismissed a citizen complaint alleging the Pacific Convenience Mart was creating a public nuisance of intoxicated people, litter and loitering; staff and council urged neighbors and the store to work together but kept enforcement options available.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6123877,"Omaha council delays liquor-license recommendation for Y Family Convenience Store after neighbors object",173,787000,960000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc&start=787&end=960","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2687501-4c8ad3e20c74fea6e8286eb60dcbadbc/thumbnail_787000.jpg","/articles/6123877/Omaha/Douglas-County/Nebraska/Omaha-council-delays-liquor-license-recommendation-for-Y-Family-Convenience-Store-after-neighbors-object","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6123877-ad651d9222960a10675860a583f5c191/orig.mp4?Expires=1771129270&Signature=VWooeXOwYfn5t-RWhBJQUwUKt7iK9qE-wpfjD1-rTcw63ltGpTZjHMMC-cXv4Tkwt6vRLnUNTxO2DYnCwuvdLbwYZHZoPTSM56n~H-QjK5gbpeqCMllD8AJQSCglgI31L8mEQ3p8v23GsIjeLyCmBHhVbTEGv4Xg~TyCReX4pc3khXB2HHPKlPqmw7c0VAFRNZ9RZNHw~TLPg6qaJo6KDxp~WKpaBnC6M-djnk1xd6JNhATC2VVI2cqcMhJT4Jjo2VwXW53X6to~q0JCy1UrO-8woTaL8vjjEEacBYU94np5JZgRbjWRBhRZKeajrW5yNeW3ZlZGXZC7DJpn9AiiGQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Omaha City Council on March 18 laid over a recommendation on a Class D liquor-license application for Y Family Convenience Store at 7102 North 30th Street after neighborhood residents raised concerns about parking, noise, and an apparent clustering of liquor retailers.

Neighbors and neighborhood association leaders urged the council to deny the license, telling members they already have “at least six places that sell liquor within a mile,” noting incidents of loitering, litter from small “shooter” bottles, and recurring noise problems from nearby motorcycle gatherings. Nancy Gardner, president of the Miller Park-Minne Lusa Neighborhood Association, said the group polled residents and found 10 opposed and 2 in favor.

The applicants’ attorney, Peng Li, told the council the store would be a family-owned business focused primarily on groceries and household goods and that “we plan to have 65% of items as groceries and household goods … and the remaining 35% of the inventory will consist [of] alcohol.” The owner, Yodit (last name not provided), answered planning and parking questions in detail and said the building’s interior layout divides retail and an office area.

Why it matters: Residents said the site sits on a narrow stretch of Thirtieth Street used by a motorcycle club and near a bus stop, and they argued adding another liquor outlet could worsen parking and safety issues. Council members also flagged the short public-notice window that often precedes liquor applications and suggested the neighborhood did not have enough time to respond before today’s meeting.

Council actions and next steps: Councilwoman Donnie R. Johnson moved to deny the license; that motion was seconded but later withdrawn as members explored an alternative. Councilwoman Melton then moved — and the council approved — laying the item over one week (to March 18 per the clerk’s scheduling window), 6–1, to give the applicant and neighborhood association time to meet and attempt to negotiate conditions. Council members who supported the layover said they preferred an agreement with enforceable conditions over a denial that might be reversed at the state Liquor Commission with no local conditions.

What participants pressed on: Residents pressed for limits on single-serve “shooter” products and restricted hours; council members probed the exact grocery-to-liquor floor-space split, asked whether an occupancy permit had been fully issued, and sought clarity about current parking stalls on site. Planning staff confirmed inspections were passed but said some permit records had not been fully communicated to council staff before the hearing.

Where it goes from here: The council left the matter open for the parties to meet and report back at the next meeting. If the council recommends denial and the applicant appeals, the state Liquor Commission would make the final decision and could impose different conditions. For now the council’s vote was procedural — a one-week layover so neighbors and the applicant can negotiate.

Votes and procedural record: Motion to lay over one week — Passed 6 to 1 (Melton, Roe, Begley, Hugg, Johnson, President: yes; Harding: no). Motion to deny (initial motion by Councilwoman Johnson) was made and later withdrawn.

Ending: Neighbors and the applicants agreed on the record to try to meet in the intervening week. The council said it would expect follow-up and that any neighborhood agreements could be used to inform the council’s later recommendation to the state Liquor Commission if the application proceeds.","The City Council laid over a decision on a Class D liquor-license recommendation for Y Family Convenience Store at 7102 N. 30th St. after neighbors and the store’s applicants clashed over parking, noise and neighborhood impact. Council voted to delay the recommendation one week to allow the parties to meet.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Omaha City Council roundup: liquor licenses, plats and routine measures approved; a few items laid over

Council approves 293-unit Elmington apartments in North Omaha over neighborhood objections

After months of neighbor complaints about dust, council approves Schouler replat but warns operator on enforcement

Council dismisses complaint against Pacific Convenience Mart after neighbors describe loitering and litter

Omaha council delays liquor-license recommendation for Y Family Convenience Store after neighbors object