City approves $395K budget for case management and client assistance services
March 18, 2025 | Introduced, Senate, 2025 Bills, District of Columbia Legislation Bills, District of Columbia
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The District of Columbia Senate State Legislature has introduced Council Bill 260168 on March 18, 2025, aimed at enhancing support for vulnerable populations through a structured funding approach. The bill outlines a comprehensive cost reimbursement framework for various essential services, including transportation, emergency utility assistance, and case management.
The primary purpose of Council Bill 260168 is to allocate funds for services that assist individuals and families in need, particularly those facing financial hardships. Key provisions include a detailed breakdown of costs associated with transportation, application fees, emergency utility assistance, and household essentials. For instance, the bill proposes a not-to-exceed (NTE) cost of $7,500 for transportation services, $2,700 for initial application fees, and $18,000 for emergency utility assistance, among others. The total reimbursement amount for these services is capped at $47,100.
Notably, the bill also includes provisions for case management services, which are crucial for effectively coordinating support for clients. The total service price for case management is estimated at $332,698.86, with additional incentives amounting to $16,200. The grand total for Option Period Two, which encompasses all components of the bill, is set at $395,998.86.
Debates surrounding the bill have focused on its potential impact on budget allocations and the effectiveness of the proposed services. Some legislators express concerns about the sustainability of funding for these programs, while others advocate for the necessity of such support in addressing the needs of the community.
The implications of Council Bill 260168 are significant, as it seeks to provide a structured approach to funding essential services that can alleviate financial burdens for many residents. Experts suggest that if implemented effectively, the bill could lead to improved outcomes for vulnerable populations, fostering greater stability and access to necessary resources.
As the legislative process continues, stakeholders will closely monitor discussions and potential amendments to the bill, which could shape its final form and impact on the community.
The primary purpose of Council Bill 260168 is to allocate funds for services that assist individuals and families in need, particularly those facing financial hardships. Key provisions include a detailed breakdown of costs associated with transportation, application fees, emergency utility assistance, and household essentials. For instance, the bill proposes a not-to-exceed (NTE) cost of $7,500 for transportation services, $2,700 for initial application fees, and $18,000 for emergency utility assistance, among others. The total reimbursement amount for these services is capped at $47,100.
Notably, the bill also includes provisions for case management services, which are crucial for effectively coordinating support for clients. The total service price for case management is estimated at $332,698.86, with additional incentives amounting to $16,200. The grand total for Option Period Two, which encompasses all components of the bill, is set at $395,998.86.
Debates surrounding the bill have focused on its potential impact on budget allocations and the effectiveness of the proposed services. Some legislators express concerns about the sustainability of funding for these programs, while others advocate for the necessity of such support in addressing the needs of the community.
The implications of Council Bill 260168 are significant, as it seeks to provide a structured approach to funding essential services that can alleviate financial burdens for many residents. Experts suggest that if implemented effectively, the bill could lead to improved outcomes for vulnerable populations, fostering greater stability and access to necessary resources.
As the legislative process continues, stakeholders will closely monitor discussions and potential amendments to the bill, which could shape its final form and impact on the community.
View Bill
This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution
View Bill