Senate Ethics Committee questions Wiggleson about Time to Read and conflicts of interest

March 15, 2025 | 2025 Legislature MT, Montana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate Ethics Committee questions Wiggleson about Time to Read and conflicts of interest
In a recent Senate Ethics Committee meeting, significant discussions unfolded regarding the relationship between a company called Time to Read and former Senator Ellsworth, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. The meeting, held on March 15, 2025, highlighted the testimony of Mr. Wiggleson, an employee of Time to Read, who disclosed his past ownership of the company and Ellsworth's subsequent acquisition of it.

Wiggleson emphasized that his employment and the company's dealings were separate from any contracts or recommendations involving other businesses, asserting that there was no wrongdoing in his professional conduct. He expressed concerns about the ethics investigation, suggesting that it felt like a "fishing expedition" aimed at discrediting him rather than uncovering the truth. He also voiced feelings of being publicly shamed and questioned the fairness of the process, indicating that his rights had been violated.

The committee's dynamics were also scrutinized, with Senator McGilvery expressing frustration over the perceived imbalance in the questioning process. He noted that Wiggleson was able to present his side without sufficient challenge from the committee, which he found troubling. This sentiment reflects broader concerns about transparency and fairness in the ethics investigation process.

As the committee prepares to draft its report, the implications of these discussions resonate with the community, particularly regarding the integrity of public officials and the ethical standards expected in government. The outcome of this investigation could influence public trust in the legislative process and the accountability of elected officials in Montana.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Montana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI