Minnesota Legislature introduces Do Not Pay database for state contractors

March 17, 2025 | Senate Bills, Introduced Bills, 2025 Bills, Minnesota Legislation Bills, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Minnesota Legislature introduces Do Not Pay database for state contractors
The Minnesota State Legislature introduced Senate Bill 2625 on March 17, 2025, aimed at enhancing accountability in state contracting by establishing a "Do Not Pay" database. This initiative seeks to prevent individuals and businesses that are deceased, convicted of fraud against the state, or indebted to the state from receiving state contracts or payments.

The bill mandates the commissioner of Minnesota's Department of Administration, with support from the commissioner of information technology services, to maintain this database. State agencies will be required to contribute names and relevant data to the database when they identify individuals who meet the criteria for exclusion. Before entering into contracts or making payments, agencies must verify the eligibility of vendors or payment recipients against this database.

Key provisions of the bill include the establishment of a centralized database that aims to streamline the process of identifying ineligible parties, thereby reducing the risk of fraud and ensuring that state funds are allocated responsibly. The bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers regarding its potential effectiveness and the administrative burden it may impose on state agencies.

Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step toward greater transparency and fiscal responsibility, while critics express concerns about the potential for bureaucratic inefficiencies and the accuracy of the data maintained in the database. The implications of this legislation could be significant, as it may lead to increased scrutiny of state contracts and a shift in how state agencies manage vendor relationships.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its future will depend on further debates and potential amendments aimed at addressing concerns raised by both supporters and opponents. The outcome of Senate Bill 2625 could set a precedent for how Minnesota manages state funding and vendor accountability in the years to come.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI