Health Society opposes House Bill 10 for imposing barriers on minor medical care

February 22, 2025 | Children and Family Law, House of Representatives, Committees , Legislative, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Health Society opposes House Bill 10 for imposing barriers on minor medical care
During a recent meeting of the New Hampshire Legislature's House Children and Family Law Committee, significant concerns were raised regarding House Bill 10, which proposes new parental consent requirements for minors seeking healthcare services. Advocates and healthcare professionals expressed fears that the bill could hinder access to essential medical care for young people, particularly those facing sensitive health issues.

The New Hampshire Medical Society voiced strong opposition to the bill, emphasizing that requiring written parental consent before a healthcare provider can even schedule an appointment for a minor could lead to delays in treatment. This is particularly concerning for vulnerable youth who may already be hesitant to seek help due to fears about their safety or well-being. The society argued that such barriers could discourage minors from pursuing necessary medical and mental health services, potentially resulting in life-threatening consequences.

Representative Raymond, a parent of teenagers, shared a personal anecdote to illustrate the practical implications of the bill. He questioned whether he would need to obtain additional consent for routine medical prescriptions, highlighting the confusion and potential obstacles the legislation could create for families.

In contrast, parental rights advocate Anne Marie Banfield supported the bill but pointed out that it lacks provisions to protect parents' rights regarding their children's personal information, particularly in the context of educational technology. She raised alarms about data privacy issues, noting that companies like PowerSchool have faced lawsuits for mishandling student data. Banfield argued that parents should have control over their children's sensitive information and that the bill should address these concerns.

Representative David Luno also contributed to the discussion, expressing worries that the bill could undermine local control over educational standards. He highlighted recent changes to state academic standards that he believes could negatively impact the quality of education in New Hampshire.

As the committee continues to deliberate on House Bill 10, the discussions reflect a broader concern about balancing parental rights, children's access to healthcare, and the protection of sensitive information in an increasingly digital world. The outcomes of this legislation could have lasting implications for families and healthcare providers across the state.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI