New Hampshire panel debates bill to allow 17-year-olds in military to marry

A proposed bill to lower the marriage age to 17 for active-duty military personnel sparked intense debate during a recent New Hampshire legislative meeting. Advocates argue that allowing young military members to marry can foster stable family units, especially when one partner may be deployed for extended periods. Representative Seidel, who supports the bill, emphasized the emotional toll on families separated by military service, stating, “It seems unfair to the child as well as the other person who may turn 18 within a few months.”

However, opponents raised significant concerns about the implications of such a change. Representative Petrino highlighted the risks of marrying at a young age, particularly for women, stating, “More often than not, we are talking about a female under the age of 18, a minor.” Critics also pointed out that the military already provides support for families without requiring marriage, with Representative Craig noting that single service members can access housing allowances.

The discussion revealed a deep divide among lawmakers. Some argued that the bill could lead to potential exploitation, with Representative Raymond warning that it could allow for inappropriate age disparities in marriages. “Nothing in this bill prohibits someone of any age to marry a 17-year-old as long as that person is in the military,” he cautioned.

As the debate continues, the future of the bill remains uncertain. Lawmakers are grappling with balancing the needs of military families against the potential risks of allowing minors to marry. The committee's decision will likely shape the conversation around marriage laws in New Hampshire for years to come.