Professors criticize Charter Oak's scaling report for undermining quality education

In a recent meeting of the Connecticut State Colleges and Universities, concerns were raised about the proposed scaling plan for Charter Oak State College, which many believe could jeopardize the quality of education for students. As the discussions unfolded, the atmosphere was charged with apprehension, particularly regarding the reliance on artificial intelligence for tutoring and advising services.

One professor, voicing significant worries, emphasized that effective teaching hinges on instructors being active scholars in their fields. "Quality teaching that prepares students for careers depends upon the instructor being an active scholar," they stated, highlighting the rapid changes in many disciplines that require educators to stay current. The professor argued that practical, hands-on experiences are essential for students, especially in fields where virtual learning may fall short.

The conversation shifted to the expectations of business leaders, who seek candidates with strong interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence. The professor noted that personal observations in the classroom are crucial for providing meaningful recommendations for students entering the job market. Without direct interaction, it would be challenging to assess these vital attributes.

The most alarming point raised was the proposal to replace traditional tutoring and advising with AI systems. The professor expressed disbelief, stating that only subject matter experts can effectively guide students through their academic challenges. "Students who really need help cannot articulate what they understand and what they don't," they explained, underscoring the limitations of AI in addressing individual student needs.

Following this, Professor Cindy Stretch from Southern Connecticut State University echoed these sentiments, criticizing the plan for its potential to undermine educational quality. She described the proposal as a troubling capitulation to privatization, suggesting it prioritizes financial interests over the educational needs of students. Stretch's remarks resonated with the collective dismay expressed by her colleagues, who fear that the plan could lead to a further erosion of the quality of education at state universities.

As the meeting concluded, the concerns raised painted a stark picture of the challenges ahead for Connecticut's higher education system. The discussions underscored a critical need for a reevaluation of the proposed scaling plan, emphasizing that the future of education should prioritize student engagement and quality instruction over cost-cutting measures.