Senate Bill 466 proposes penalties for property theft and restoration mandates

March 14, 2025 | Senate Bills (Introduced), 2025 Bills, Maryland Legislation Bills Collections, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate Bill 466 proposes penalties for property theft and restoration mandates
Senate Bill 466, introduced in Maryland on March 14, 2025, aims to strengthen penalties for property theft and enhance restitution requirements for offenders. The bill outlines a tiered system of penalties based on the value of stolen property, with significant implications for both offenders and victims.

Under the proposed legislation, individuals convicted of theft involving property valued at less than $1,500 would face misdemeanor charges, potentially resulting in up to one year of imprisonment or a fine of $500. For property valued between $1,500 and $100,000, offenders could face up to ten years in prison or a fine of $15,000. More severe penalties apply to those convicted of stealing property worth $100,000 or more, classified as a felony, which could lead to a maximum of 20 years in prison and a fine of $25,000.

A notable provision of the bill mandates that offenders must restore the stolen property or its equivalent value to the rightful owner or the owner's estate if deceased. This restitution requirement is designed to ensure that victims are compensated for their losses, reinforcing the bill's focus on victim rights.

The bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers regarding its potential impact on crime rates and the justice system. Supporters argue that the increased penalties and restitution requirements will deter theft and provide justice for victims. However, some critics express concerns about the bill's implications for prison overcrowding and the fairness of imposing harsh penalties for lower-value thefts.

Experts suggest that while the bill may lead to a decrease in property crimes, its effectiveness will depend on proper enforcement and the judicial system's capacity to handle increased cases. The bill's passage could signal a shift in Maryland's approach to property crime, emphasizing accountability and victim restitution.

As Senate Bill 466 moves through the legislative process, its outcomes will be closely monitored, with potential implications for crime policy and victim rights in Maryland. The bill represents a significant step toward addressing property theft and ensuring that victims receive justice and restitution for their losses.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI