Arkansas repeals sections of delta-8 and delta-10 THC legislation

On March 13, 2025, the Arkansas Legislature introduced Senate Bill 455, a legislative measure aimed at addressing the regulation of delta-8 and delta-10 tetrahydrocannabinol, two cannabinoids derived from hemp. The bill seeks to repeal specific provisions from Acts 2023, No. 629, which previously governed the enforcement of regulations surrounding these substances.

The primary focus of SB455 is to eliminate Sections 2-5 of the aforementioned act, which have been a point of contention in the state. The bill stipulates that its provisions will only take effect upon certification from the Arkansas Attorney General that the state is currently enjoined from enforcing the repealed sections. This conditional clause indicates a strategic approach to ensure that the bill aligns with ongoing legal considerations regarding the enforcement of cannabinoid regulations.

Debate surrounding SB455 has highlighted the complexities of regulating hemp-derived products, particularly as public interest in cannabinoids has surged. Proponents argue that the repeal will provide clarity and potentially foster a more favorable environment for businesses involved in the hemp industry. Conversely, opponents express concerns about the potential for increased accessibility to these substances without adequate oversight, raising questions about public health and safety.

The implications of SB455 extend beyond regulatory frameworks; they touch on economic factors as well. The hemp industry has been a growing sector in Arkansas, and changes in regulation could influence market dynamics, consumer access, and state revenue from related taxes. Experts suggest that a balanced approach is necessary to ensure both the growth of the industry and the protection of public health.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, stakeholders from various sectors are closely monitoring developments. The outcome of SB455 could set a precedent for how Arkansas navigates the evolving landscape of cannabinoid regulation, with potential ripple effects on both state policy and the broader hemp market. The next steps will involve further discussions and potential amendments as lawmakers weigh the benefits and risks associated with the proposed changes.