Yamhill Planning Commission member Carol voted out after 22 years of service

The City of Yamhill held a planning meeting on March 13, 2025, where significant discussions centered around the recent changes in the Planning Commission, particularly the expiration of terms and the appointment process for new members.

The meeting began with a focus on the status of three Planning Commission positions that were set to expire on December 31. Carol, a long-serving member, expressed concern over the lack of notification regarding the need to reapply for her position. She highlighted that she had not been informed of any application requirements, which led to confusion among the current members.

Sharon, a city staff member, clarified that the mayor had decided to open the positions for new applicants, as three terms had expired. This decision was based on a review of city code, which indicated that there was no obligation to automatically reinstate current members. Carol contested this, stating that she had served for 22 years and had only reapplied twice in that time, suggesting that the process this year felt unjust and lacked transparency.

Tensions escalated as Carol revealed that she had seen a text message indicating that the mayor had directed staff to post the openings due to dissatisfaction with the performance of the current members. This revelation raised questions about the motivations behind the decision to open the positions and whether it was handled fairly. Carol expressed her disappointment and concern for the direction of the city, emphasizing the importance of accountability to the citizens of Yamhill.

As the meeting progressed, other commissioners acknowledged Carol's contributions and expressed their regret over her departure from the commission. The atmosphere was marked by a mix of camaraderie and frustration, as members reflected on the changes and the implications for the community.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the complexities of local governance and the emotional impact of changes within the Planning Commission. The discussions highlighted the need for clear communication and transparency in the appointment process, as well as the importance of ensuring that city officials remain accountable to the residents they serve.