In a recent meeting of the Florida State Legislature's Committee on Criminal Justice, lawmakers discussed Senate Bill 952, which aims to repeal a statute that prohibits the sale and purchase of firearms and ammunition during declared states of emergency. The bill's sponsor, Senator Angolia, argued that the current law is not only confusing but also potentially unconstitutional, as it infringes on Second Amendment rights.
Senator Angolia highlighted a specific incident in Okeechobee on September 26, 2024, when local officials enacted an emergency ordinance banning firearm sales during a hurricane. This ordinance was quickly rescinded after public outcry from Second Amendment advocates, illustrating the confusion surrounding the existing law. The senator emphasized that the law creates unnecessary barriers for law-abiding citizens seeking to protect themselves during emergencies.
The discussion included concerns about how local governments interpret the statute, particularly during civil unrest or natural disasters. Vice Chair Smith raised questions about the implications of repealing the law, noting that it could lead to a lack of restrictions during emergencies where public safety is at risk. However, supporters of the bill, including representatives from Gun Owners of America and Florida Carry, argued that individuals should have the right to access firearms during emergencies to ensure their safety and that of their families.
Several speakers voiced their support for the bill, citing past instances where local governments overstepped their authority by banning firearm sales during crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. They argued that the right to bear arms is crucial during times of uncertainty and that the government should not impose restrictions that could leave citizens vulnerable.
As the committee deliberated, it became clear that the bill's passage could significantly impact how firearm sales are regulated during emergencies in Florida. The committee is expected to vote on the bill in the coming weeks, with advocates urging for a favorable outcome to protect citizens' rights and clarify the legal landscape surrounding firearm access during emergencies.