Maryland Senators Hester and Smith introduce revenge porn bill in 2025 session

March 10, 2025 | Senate Bills (Introduced), 2025 Bills, Maryland Legislation Bills Collections, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Maryland Senators Hester and Smith introduce revenge porn bill in 2025 session
Senate Bill 360, introduced in the Maryland Legislature on March 10, 2025, aims to address the growing issue of "revenge porn" by establishing both civil and criminal remedies for victims. The bill, sponsored by Senators Hester and Smith, seeks to empower individuals to take legal action against those who knowingly distribute non-consensual explicit images or videos, including computer-generated representations.

The key provisions of the bill include the authorization for victims to file civil lawsuits for defamation under specific circumstances, as well as the prohibition of distributing certain visual representations without consent. This legislative move is a response to increasing concerns about the emotional and psychological harm caused by the unauthorized sharing of intimate images, which can lead to severe consequences for victims.

Debate surrounding Senate Bill 360 has highlighted the balance between protecting individual rights and ensuring freedom of expression. Some lawmakers have expressed concerns about potential overreach and the implications for artistic and educational content. Amendments to the bill are expected as discussions continue, particularly regarding the definitions of consent and the scope of the proposed penalties.

The implications of this bill are significant, as it not only aims to provide legal recourse for victims but also seeks to deter the distribution of non-consensual explicit content. Experts in the field of digital privacy and law have noted that such legislation is crucial in the current digital age, where the rapid spread of information can have devastating effects on individuals' lives.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its potential to reshape the legal landscape surrounding privacy rights and personal dignity in Maryland remains a focal point of discussion. If passed, Senate Bill 360 could serve as a model for other states grappling with similar issues, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for stronger protections against digital harassment and exploitation.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI