State Board imposes new fee structure for professional employers
March 09, 2025 | House Bills - Introduced, House Bills, 2025 House and Senate Bills, Nevada Legislation Bills, Nevada
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
On March 9, 2025, the Nevada State Legislature introduced Assembly Bill 191, a significant piece of legislation aimed at regulating fees imposed by state professional employers on their employees. The bill seeks to address concerns regarding the financial burdens placed on employees by mandating that these employers cannot pass certain fees onto their workforce.
Key provisions of AB191 include the establishment of a fee structure that state professional employers must adhere to, with penalties for non-compliance. Specifically, if a state professional employer fails to pay the assessed fee by July 31, they face a civil penalty of up to $10 for each professional employee affected. Notably, the bill stipulates that the fee must be paid regardless of whether an employee is a member of a professional organization or has been employed for a full calendar year.
The bill also outlines the role of the Division of Human Resource Management within the Department of Administration, allowing state professional employers to utilize its services for support in implementing the provisions of the bill. In return, the Division may charge an annual fee for each professional employee within designated bargaining units, with the collected funds earmarked for operational costs associated with this support.
Debate surrounding AB191 has highlighted concerns from various stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for protecting employees from undue financial strain and ensuring fair labor practices. Conversely, opponents express worries about the potential administrative burden on state employers and the implications of additional fees on their operational budgets.
The economic implications of AB191 could be significant, as it aims to enhance employee protections while potentially increasing costs for state employers. Socially, the bill reflects a growing trend towards prioritizing employee welfare in the workplace, aligning with broader labor rights movements.
As the legislative process unfolds, experts suggest that the bill could lead to increased scrutiny of employer practices and a shift in how state professional employers manage their financial obligations to employees. The outcome of AB191 may set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, influencing labor relations and employer-employee dynamics across the nation.
Key provisions of AB191 include the establishment of a fee structure that state professional employers must adhere to, with penalties for non-compliance. Specifically, if a state professional employer fails to pay the assessed fee by July 31, they face a civil penalty of up to $10 for each professional employee affected. Notably, the bill stipulates that the fee must be paid regardless of whether an employee is a member of a professional organization or has been employed for a full calendar year.
The bill also outlines the role of the Division of Human Resource Management within the Department of Administration, allowing state professional employers to utilize its services for support in implementing the provisions of the bill. In return, the Division may charge an annual fee for each professional employee within designated bargaining units, with the collected funds earmarked for operational costs associated with this support.
Debate surrounding AB191 has highlighted concerns from various stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for protecting employees from undue financial strain and ensuring fair labor practices. Conversely, opponents express worries about the potential administrative burden on state employers and the implications of additional fees on their operational budgets.
The economic implications of AB191 could be significant, as it aims to enhance employee protections while potentially increasing costs for state employers. Socially, the bill reflects a growing trend towards prioritizing employee welfare in the workplace, aligning with broader labor rights movements.
As the legislative process unfolds, experts suggest that the bill could lead to increased scrutiny of employer practices and a shift in how state professional employers manage their financial obligations to employees. The outcome of AB191 may set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, influencing labor relations and employer-employee dynamics across the nation.
View Bill
This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution
View Bill