Wildlife Society opposes Senate Bill 21 37 citing lack of scientific support

The North Dakota State Legislature's House Energy and Natural Resources Committee convened on March 7, 2025, to discuss several key issues, notably Senate Bill 21-37, which has sparked significant debate regarding wildlife management practices in the state.

During the meeting, concerns were raised about the scientific basis of Senate Bill 21-37. Critics argued that the bill undermines the authority of the North Dakota Game and Fish Department, which relies on adaptive wildlife management strategies to respond to changing environmental conditions and emerging scientific data. A representative from the North Dakota chapter of the Wildlife Society emphasized that the bill does not benefit all North Dakotans or deer hunters and is not supported by strong scientific evidence. They urged lawmakers to reject the bill, stating it compromises wildlife health and management flexibility.

The discussion highlighted the importance of evidence-based decision-making in wildlife management. The Game and Fish Department has implemented baiting restrictions only in areas where Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) poses a risk, showcasing a proactive approach to wildlife health. However, critics of Senate Bill 21-37 expressed that its passage would hinder the department's ability to adapt to new challenges.

A former USDA employee, who spoke during the meeting, praised the dedication and professionalism of the North Dakota Game and Fish staff, asserting that effective legislation is crucial for their success. He reiterated the call to reject Senate Bill 21-37, emphasizing that it does not align with the best practices for wildlife management.

The committee's discussions reflect ongoing tensions between legislative proposals and scientific recommendations in managing North Dakota's wildlife resources. As the legislative session progresses, the fate of Senate Bill 21-37 remains uncertain, with advocates for wildlife conservation urging lawmakers to prioritize science-based policies.